Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 2 jurisdictions
€77.6mTotal of monetary amounts
€38.8mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €77.6m 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €77.6m 100 % · 2 cases

Who?

by company
  1. Groupe Parfait €7.6m 100 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251€70m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20251€7.6m
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

2 cases

3 Nov 2025 Groupe ParfaitFrance: 7.6 million EUR against Groupe Parfait for failing to meet merger remedies (Martinique) FranceMerger control €7.6m

In 2022, clearance of an acquisition in food retail in Martinique was made conditional on the divestiture of a Géant Casino hypermarket by September 2023; Parfait only sold it in September 2025, allowed the value of the assets to deteriorate and obstructed the trustee (decision 25-D-05). Fines: 4.5 million EUR (divestiture), 2.5 million EUR (preservation of value), 600,000 EUR (cooperation).

What organisations can take from it

Merger control commitments are binding – missed deadlines and a lack of cooperation with the trustee are sanctioned separately.

Relevance to training and awareness

Compliance with merger remedies and cooperation with trustees

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
Verstoß gegen Zusagen aus Freigabeentscheidung 22-DCC-254 (Fusionskontrolle, Code de commerce)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Published
3 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

28 Jan 2025 OGH raises gun-jumping fine against food retailer from 1.5 to 70 million EUR AustriaMerger control €70m

A food retail group anonymised in the decision (R*) had, through its subsidiary, implemented a notifiable concentration without merger control clearance by means of a long-term lease of store space in a shopping centre (1 July 2018 to 20 September 2022). The Cartel Court (Kartellgericht) imposed a fine of 1.5 million EUR; Austria's Supreme Court (Oberster Gerichtshof, OGH) upheld the appeals of the Federal Competition Authority (Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde, BWB) and the Federal Cartel Prosecutor (Bundeskartellanwalt) and set the fine at 70 million EUR, taking into account the group turnover of 92.3 billion EUR and an earlier fine for prohibited implementation.

What organisations can take from it

Taking over stores by way of a lease or tenancy agreement can also be a notifiable concentration – expansion departments must check merger control requirements.

Relevance to training and awareness

Notification requirement for site takeovers through leases or tenancy agreements

Authority / court
Oberster Gerichtshof als Kartellobergericht (Antrag der Bundeswettbewerbsbehörde)
Area of law
Competition law · Merger control
Legal basis
§ 29 Z 1 lit a iVm § 17 Abs 1 KartG 2005
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Repeat case
yes
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial