Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

5cases from 4 jurisdictions
€27.1mTotal of monetary amounts
€4.67mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€43,000
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20251€4.67m
Q1 20261€7.8m
Q2 20262€14.6m
Q3 20260—

5 cases

25 Jun 2026 Самостоятелна медико-диагностична лаборатория „Лина“ ЕООДLaboratory Lina lures customers with free blood tests – 52,097 EUR for unfair competition BulgariaCompetition law €52,097

On application by its competitor Ramus, the Комисия за защита на конкуренцията (Bulgarian Commission for the Protection of Competition, KZK) established that the laboratory had offered packages of medical laboratory tests free of charge nationwide over extended periods (only against a fee of 2 leva for taking blood) – conduct shown by no other market participant outside joint campaigns. It found an infringement of the general clause of unfair competition law (Art. 29 ZZK – Bulgarian Protection of Competition Act) and imposed 0.3% of 2024 turnover, i.e. 52,096.55 EUR. Appeals have been lodged against the decision.

What organisations can take from it

Permanent free offers to win customers can be unfair if they deviate significantly from market practice and drive out competitors.

Authority / court
Комисия за защита на конкуренцията (КЗК, Bulgarische Wettbewerbskommission)
Area of law
Competition law
Legal basis
Art. 29 ZZK (Generalklausel unlauterer Wettbewerb)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Healthcare
Published
2 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

17 Apr 2026 Medirex s. r. o.; KLINICKÁ BIOCHÉMIA s.r.o.; Unilabs Slovensko, s. r. o.; synlab slovakia s. r. o.; Asociácia laboratóriíLaboratory cartel: 14.6 million EUR and procurement bans against diagnostic laboratories SlovakiaCartels and collusion €14.6m

Four laboratories and their association coordinated negotiations on prices with health insurers, coordinated in tenders, exchanged sensitive information and allocated customers. At first instance, the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 14,551,800 EUR and three-year procurement bans; Unilabs received a substantially reduced fine as leniency applicant and under a settlement.

What organisations can take from it

Common negotiating positions towards payers via an association are a cartel – association meetings need minutes and a review of the agenda.

Relevance to training and awareness

Information exchange among competitors and association work

Authority / court
Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Kartellverbot)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Unilabs: leniency reduction (50%) and settlement (a further 30%).
Published
12 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Jan 2026 PHOENIX Zdravotnícke zásobovanie, a.s.; TRANSMEDIC SLOVAKIA, s.r.o. (in Konkurs)Pharmaceutical cartel uncovered thanks to whistleblower: 7.8 million EUR against PHOENIX and TRANSMEDIC SlovakiaCartels and collusion €7.8m

The two companies colluded in tenders of the General Health Insurance Company for the supply of medicines (2017–2020). For the first time, a cartel was uncovered on the basis of information from a whistleblower; the Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (Antimonopoly Office of the Slovak Republic, PMÚ SR) imposed 7,595,200 EUR and a one-year procurement ban on PHOENIX and 201,800 EUR and a three-year procurement ban on TRANSMEDIC (first instance).

What organisations can take from it

Whistleblowers receive a reward in Slovakia – internal reporting channels should be faster than the route to the authority.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bid rigging in public tenders; whistleblowing channels

Authority / court
Protimonopolný úrad Slovenskej republiky (PMÚ SR)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Slowakisches Wettbewerbsschutzgesetz (Submissionsabsprache)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
PHOENIX: settlement with a 30% fine reduction and a shortened procurement ban.
Published
24 Feb 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 Nov 2025 DoctolibFrance: 4.665 million EUR against Doctolib for abuse in doctor appointment booking FranceAbuse of market power €4.67m

Doctolib tied doctors with exclusivity clauses, bundled telemedicine with the appointment booking subscription and in 2018 acquired its main competitor MonDocteur in order to eliminate it (decision 25-D-06). Fines: 4.615 million EUR for exclusivity and tying, 50,000 EUR for the acquisition.

What organisations can take from it

Platforms with high market shares should have exclusivity clauses, bundled offers and acquisitions of rivals reviewed under competition law.

Authority / court
Autorité de la concurrence
Area of law
Competition law · Abuse of market power
Legal basis
Art. 102 AEUV, Art. L.420-2 Code de commerce
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Healthcare
Culpability
intentional
Published
6 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Dec 2023 Veterinarska zbornica SlovenijeVeterinary chamber: 43,000 EUR for ban on discounts and advertising SloveniaCartels and collusion €43,000

Since 2015, the chamber’s professional code had prohibited its members from offering services below list price, at a discount or free of charge and from advertising prices and promotions – including online. As the first decision under the new act and in the first settlement procedure, the Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (Slovenian Competition Protection Agency, AVK) imposed 43,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Professional codes of chambers are decisions of associations of undertakings – price and advertising bans in them infringe competition law.

Authority / court
Javna agencija Republike Slovenije za varstvo konkurence (AVK)
Area of law
Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis
Art. 5 ZPOmK-2, Art. 101 AEUV (3062-13/2019)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with acknowledgement of responsibility.
Published
22 Jan 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial