Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Competition law Construction and real estate Gwalimba Construction (Pty) Ltd Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

€2,596Total of monetary amounts

€2,596Largest single case: Gwalimba Construction (Pty) Ltd

€2,596Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

South Africa €2,596 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic

Cartels and collusion €2,596 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q4 2023	0	–
Q1 2024	0	–
Q2 2024	0	–
Q3 2024	0	–
Q4 2024	0	–
Q1 2025	0	–
Q2 2025	0	–
Q3 2025	0	–
Q4 2025	0	–
Q1 2026	0	–
Q2 2026	1	€2,596
Q3 2026	0	–
Q4 2026	0	–

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

21 Apr 2026 Gwalimba Construction (Pty) LtdAlleged collusion on a government job: Gwalimba Construction allegedly pays ZAR 50,000 South AfricaCartels and collusion €2,596

On 21 April 2026 the Competition Tribunal (South Africa's competition adjudicator) confirmed a settlement with Gwalimba Construction (Pty) Ltd. Following a complaint by the Department of Home Affairs (home affairs ministry), the Competition Commission (competition authority) had found that Gwalimba and Superway Construction (Pty) Ltd agreed not to compete against each other on certain tenders – including a request for quotes for fire-compliance repair work at a government office in Pretoria. Without admitting liability, Gwalimba allegedly pays an administrative penalty of 50,000 ZAR, will cooperate in the case against Superway and will introduce a competition law compliance programme.

What organisations can take from it

Even small construction firms must avoid any coordination with competitors when quoting to public bodies – authorities pursue such arrangements against small firms too.

Relevance to training and awareness

Bid rigging in public procurement

Authority / court: Competition Tribunal of South Africa (auf Antrag der Competition Commission)
Area of law: Competition law · Cartels and collusion
Legal basis: Section 4(1)(b)(i), (ii) und (iii) Competition Act 89 of 1998
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: final
Sector: Construction and real estate
Repeat case: no
Mitigating circumstances: According to the parties: cooperation with the authority, a small firm with no previous contraventions, and it did not win the contract.
Published: 23 Apr 2026

Original amount 50,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Apr 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source (company names until they are anonymised).

Company names are anonymised two years after the decision in a case, in line with the practice of many supervisory authorities. The official sources remain linked.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Ready for training that actually lands?