Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

283cases from 35 jurisdictions
€2.19bnTotal of monetary amounts (236 cases with an amount)
€1mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
202214€207.1m
202348€533.4m
202468€859.1m
202577€329m
202676€266m

283 cases

16 Sep 2026 ENECHANGE株式会社ENECHANGE: 91.495 million JPY over overstated revenue in quarterly report and prospectus JapanDisclosure and reporting obligations €511,488

Because revenue had been overstated at the company and its consolidated subsidiary or subsidiaries, the quarterly report for the third quarter of 2023 (filed on 10 November 2023) showed a consolidated loss of 1,382,861 thousand JPY instead of 1,662,516 thousand JPY; the registration statement for a share issue relied on this report, and on 26 February 2024 3,784,200 shares were issued for 3,999,899,400 JPY. After the company admitted the facts and the amount, an administrative monetary penalty (kachōkin) of 91,495,000 JPY was imposed: 1,500,000 JPY for the quarterly report and 89,995,000 JPY for the registration statement.

What organisations can take from it

Revenue recognition at subsidiaries should be scrutinised before any capital increase; an error in a quarterly report becomes many times more expensive through the prospectus.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct revenue recognition before capital market transactions

Authority / court
Financial Services Agency (FSA, 金融庁) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 172-4 Abs. 2 a. F., Art. 172-2 Abs. 1 Nr. 1, Art. 185-7 Abs. 1 und 14
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Mitigating circumstances
Both partial amounts were halved because the company had filed a report for a reduction before the inspection began (Art. 185-7(14) FIEA).
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 91,495,000 JPY, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2026 AIFM Capital ABAIFM Capital: 2 million SEK for inadequate selection and oversight of fund managers SwedenOrganisational requirements €177,187

As a so-called fund hotel, the company had its funds managed by other firms, but examined these delegation agreements only insufficiently, did not take the related decisions properly and did not monitor the funds’ returns in relation to risk closely enough. The Swedish financial supervisory authority Finansinspektionen (FI) issued a remark and imposed 2 million SEK; no damage to investors was established.

What organisations can take from it

Outsourcing tasks does not outsource responsibility: document the selection of service providers, the decisions taken and ongoing oversight.

Authority / court
Finansinspektionen (FI)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Schwedisches Fondsrecht – Regeln zur Delegation der Fondsverwaltung und deren Überwachung
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
No established damage to investors; remedial measures already taken during the investigation.
Published
16 Sep 2026

Original amount 2,000,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e InvestimentoLebes Financeira: BRL 2.58m over lending to a related party above the limit BrazilOrganisational requirements €432,774

The BCB (central bank) sanctions committee COPAS imposed a fine of BRL 2,576,000.00 on Lebes Financeira S.A. – Sociedade de Crédito, Financiamento e Investimento because from January 2022 to March 2023 it engaged in prohibited credit transactions with a related company: its banking correspondent retained collected loan instalments, and the arrears reached BRL 147m at the end of November 2022, or 207.66% of adjusted equity against a limit of 10%. In addition there was a BRL 20m loan routed through a third company. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

If an affiliated distribution partner retains customer money, this can quickly become a prohibited loan to a related party.

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Lei 13.506/2017, Art. 3 II; Lei 4.595/1964, Art. 34 § 3 V d und § 4 I; Resolução CMN 4.693/2018, Arts. 5, 6 und 7 II
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 2,576,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

5 Aug 2026 Powszechna Kasa Oszczędności Bank Polski S.A. (PKO BP)PKO BP: PLN 47.5m for failings in structured deposits PolandOrganisational requirements €11m

The KNF imposed five fines totalling PLN 47,500,000 on PKO BP in connection with structured deposits: PLN 26m for failing to inform clients of existing conflicts of interest, PLN 8m each for not analysing costs and charges and for an imprecise definition of the risk category and target market, PLN 4m for selling without checking target-market suitability and PLN 1.5m for misleading sales material on two products. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Firms selling structured products must disclose conflicts of interest, test costs against client benefit and define the target market precisely.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conflicts of interest and product governance for retail investment products

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 88c Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 88m Abs. 5 und 9 Prawo bankowe i. V. m. Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 21.01.2019 über Dienstleistungen der Banken bei strukturierten Einlagen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 47,500,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Jul 2026 UBS Financial Services Inc.UBS Financial Services: 8 million USD over gaps in anti-money laundering monitoring USAOrganisational requirements €6.97m

The CFTC fined the futures commission merchant 8 million USD for failing to supervise diligently the configuration and operation of its anti-money laundering transaction monitoring. From January 2019 to June 2023, thousands of foreign currency wire transfers through retail customers' commodity accounts were insufficiently monitored or not monitored at all: first because of an incomplete manual report which UBS, contrary to commitments made in earlier proceedings in 2018, replaced only more than two years later, and then because of incorrectly fed data in the new automated system. FinCEN, the SEC and FINRA announced their own settlements with UBS Financial Services at the same time. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Commitments made in earlier supervisory proceedings must be implemented on time, and new monitoring systems must be tested for complete data feeds before going live.

Authority / court
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
CFTC Regulation 166.3 (17 C.F.R. § 166.3)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
The CFTC recognised the remediation described; according to the order, the core problems of the automated system had been fixed by the fourth quarter of 2022.
Published
3 Aug 2026

Original amount 8,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 31 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Jul 2026 China Industrial Securities International Asset Management LimitedSFC: HKD 6.8m fine for CISIAM over missed red flags in a private fund Hong KongOrganisational requirements €761,367

The SFC publicly reprimanded China Industrial Securities International Asset Management (CISIAM) and fined it HKD 6.8 million because, between August 2019 and September 2020, the manager of a private fund set up for the insurer Tahoe Life acquired complex structures with notes linked to bonds of a related company at the request of the insurer's chief investment officer, without identifying and properly examining the red flags. CISIAM also failed to observe the fund's investment restrictions and objectives and did not manage its risks effectively. In setting the penalty, the SFC also took into account management fees of around HKD 1.9 million received from the fund.

What organisations can take from it

A fund manager must independently assess an investor's instructions and must not implement unusually complex structures without a clear commercial rationale unchecked.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising red flags in investor-driven fund arrangements

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), Hongkong
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Section 194 Securities and Futures Ordinance (Cap. 571); General Principle 2 Code of Conduct; Paragraphen 1.2(d), 3.1 und 3.11.1 Fund Manager Code of Conduct; Abschnitt VIII Management, Supervision and Internal Control Guidelines
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial measures (new policies on risk management and dubious investment arrangements, compliance training), cooperation with the SFC and an otherwise clean disciplinary record.
Published
27 Jul 2026

Original amount 6,800,000 HKD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Jul 2026 Bright Smart Securities International (H.K.) LimitedBright Smart Securities: HKD 2.8m fine for inadequate wash-trade controls Hong KongMarket abuse and insider dealing €313,504

Bright Smart Securities International (H.K.) was publicly reprimanded and fined 2,800,000 HKD because between November 2023 and September 2025 its controls did not prevent 615 clients from executing 1,021 pairs of wash trades (trades without a change in beneficial ownership) in 736 shares and warrants. Monitoring was mostly after the event and manual, and several wash trades by one client on the same day counted as a single occurrence. Similar deficiencies had been identified and raised repeatedly before but were not fully remedied in any instance.

What organisations can take from it

Trade surveillance must intercept wash trades automatically before execution; after-the-event manual reviews are not enough for recurring patterns.

Relevance to training and awareness

Detecting and preventing wash trades

Authority / court
Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
s. 194 SFO (Cap. 571); Code of Conduct GP 2, para. 4.3
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Enhanced systems and a commitment to an independent effectiveness review, cooperation.
Published
27 Jul 2026

Original amount 2,800,000 HKD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jul 2026 80 Eight South Africa (Pty) Ltd (vormals Ela Asset Management (Pty) Ltd)80 Eight South Africa: failing to protect clients against fraud South AfricaOrganisational requirements Fine

The financial services provider had not made sure that its clients were protected against losses from theft, fraud or other dishonest acts by its employees; one individual's misconduct caused clients substantial losses. The company was directed to introduce, within two months, a policy protecting against such risks. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Financial services providers need effective controls against fraud by their own employees – even contraventions they discover and report themselves can lead to a penalty and directives.

Relevance to training and awareness

Insider fraud and internal controls

Authority / court
Financial Sector Conduct Authority (FSCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Sections 2 und 11 General Code of Conduct for Authorised Financial Services Providers and Representatives (2003); Section 13(3)(a) Financial Advisory and Intermediary Services Act 37 of 2002; Section 42(1) Determination of Fit and Proper Requirements for Financial Services Providers (2017)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
According to the authority's update of 22 July 2026, the company had itself discovered and reported the contraventions, which occurred in 2021.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
17 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jul 2026 Swedbank AB (publ) (mit New York Branch)NYDFS: USD 50 million against Swedbank for withholding information USA, New YorkDisclosure and reporting obligations €43.6m

The NYDFS imposed a penalty of USD 50 million on Swedbank AB (publ) and its New York branch. In response to several requests by the regulator under section 37 of the New York Banking Law concerning links between its Baltic subsidiaries and the law firm Mossack Fonseca (Panama Papers) and the status of European investigations, the bank did not provide the requested information, in breach of section 125(3) of the New York Banking Law. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Information requests from the regulator must be answered in full; withholding information is sanctioned in its own right.

Relevance to training and awareness

Complete and truthful disclosures to the regulator

Authority / court
New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
New York Banking Law § 125(3) i. V. m. § 37; Sanktion nach Banking Law §§ 39, 44
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Liability of senior managers
According to the order, the bank has since, among other things, dismissed its then Chief Compliance Officer and its former CEO and parted ways with numerous other employees; the majority of the board has been replaced.
Published
16 Jul 2026

Original amount 50,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jul 2026 HDI Global SEPRA: £4.165m fine on HDI Global SE for inaccurate data on the FSCS compensation scheme United KingdomDisclosure and reporting obligations €4.91m

The PRA fined HDI Global SE, an insurer headquartered in Hanover that operates in the UK through a branch, 4,165,000 GBP. Between August 2021 and August 2024 the firm repeatedly submitted incorrect data on liabilities protected by the FSCS and on the FSCS levy tariff, including in supposedly corrected submissions; it lacked written procedures, clear accountability and internal oversight, and before summer 2023 it did not consult the PRA's rules and guidance.

What organisations can take from it

Returns used to calculate levies need documented calculation procedures and independent review – especially where corrections are submitted.

Authority / court
Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), Bank of England
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
PRA Fundamental Rules 2 und 6; s. 206 FSMA 2000
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Detailed account under the Early Account Scheme, settlement with a 30% discount (otherwise 5,950,000 GBP), corrected historical data and additional FSCS levies paid; in the PRA's view the breaches were neither deliberate nor reckless.
Published
20 Jul 2026

Original amount 4,165,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jul 2026 TeamViewer SETeamViewer: cyberattack not disclosed as inside information without delay GermanyDisclosure and reporting obligations €240,000

Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, BaFin) imposed a fine of 240,000 EUR on the software company because it had not disclosed the information about a cyberattack it had suffered as inside information without delay. The fine notice is final.

What organisations can take from it

Put serious IT security incidents immediately before the ad hoc disclosure committee as well – the incident response process must take capital market disclosure into account.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising security incidents as potential inside information and reporting them to the ad hoc disclosure committee

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 17 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MAR (EU) Nr. 596/2014
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
20 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jul 2026 Brown Capital Management LLCBrown Capital Management: voting rights notifications not submitted on time GermanyDisclosure and reporting obligations €187,500

The Baltimore-based US asset manager had not submitted voting rights notifications to the issuer and BaFin in time; the deadline is four trading days after reaching a notifiable threshold. BaFin imposed a fine of 187,500 EUR; the notice is final.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone investing in German issuers needs automated threshold monitoring with clear responsibility for the four-day deadline.

Relevance to training and awareness

Threshold monitoring and notification deadlines for shareholdings

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
§ 33 Abs. 1 Satz 1 WpHG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
22 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jul 2026 ASX LimitedASX: 20.5 million AUD for misleading announcement on CHESS replacement project AustraliaDisclosure and reporting obligations €12.4m

The Federal Court of Australia, on application by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC, Australia's corporate, markets and financial services regulator), imposed a penalty of 20.5 million AUD on the exchange operator because a market announcement of 10 February 2022 stated that the project to replace its CHESS clearing and settlement system was progressing well. About six weeks later ASX announced a likely delay and paused the project in November 2022; in June 2026 it admitted contraventions of ss 12DA and 12DB of the ASIC Act.

What organisations can take from it

Progress updates on major projects must reflect the actual status, including known risks – and operators of critical market infrastructure are held to a particularly high standard.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accuracy and balance of market announcements about ongoing major projects

Authority / court
Federal Court of Australia (auf Antrag der Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ASIC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12DA, 12DB(1)(a) und (e)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
3 Jul 2026

Original amount 20,500,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jun 2026 Moody's Deutschland GmbHESMA fines Moody's Deutschland 2.1 million EUR EU levelOrganisational requirements €2.15m

The credit rating agency did not submit up-to-date rating information to the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA), did not provide complete historical performance data to the central repository and lacked adequate procedures and internal control mechanisms. ESMA found negligent infringements and imposed fines totalling 2,145,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Reporting obligations to the supervisory authority are data quality issues – without functioning internal controls, they become a risk of fines.

Authority / court
Europäische Wertpapier- und Marktaufsichtsbehörde (ESMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1060/2009 (CRA-Verordnung), Art. 24, 36a, Anhang III
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jun 2026 „Paysera LT“, UABPaysera: daily fine for missing annual accounts adds up to 362,000 EUR LithuaniaDisclosure and reporting obligations €362,000

Because Paysera did not comply with the order to submit its 2024 annual financial statements by 30 September 2025, the Lietuvos bankas (Bank of Lithuania, financial supervisor) first imposed 20,000 EUR in November 2025 and then a daily fine of 1,000 EUR (rising to 2,000 and 3,000 EUR respectively). As the infringement was only remedied after 6 May 2026, the daily fine added up to 362,000 EUR. Source: archived copy of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Running daily fines make every delay expensive – supervisory orders need top-management priority.

Authority / court
Lietuvos bankas (Litauische Zentralbank, Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Aufsichtsrechtliche Anordnung und Berichtspflichten nach litauischem E-Geld-Recht
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
30 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jun 2026 Curtis Faraday LimitedFCA bars debt adviser Curtis Faraday from taking new customers over consumer risks United KingdomOrganisational requirements Order

The FCA barred the debt advice firm Curtis Faraday Limited with immediate effect from accepting new customers or referrals for debt, insolvency and IVA-related activities and required it to refer existing customers to other advice providers. Based on file reviews and call recordings, the FCA saw indications that customers' financial information was distorted during the advice process, that the business model, with close links to insolvency service providers, created conflicts of interest and a bias towards commission-generating solutions, that staff circumvented controls and that the firm repeatedly gave the FCA incomplete or inconsistent information.

What organisations can take from it

Debt advice must be impartial: commission incentives and close links to debt solution providers require effective controls against product bias.

Relevance to training and awareness

Impartial advice and handling conflicts of interest

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
s. 55L(3)(a) FSMA 2000; Threshold Conditions nach Schedule 6 FSMA (paras. 2C, 2D, 2E und 2F)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Jun 2026 Netrios LP Ltd.; Red Acre Ltd.Netrios and Red Acre: 2.5 million USD for white-label leveraged trading with US retail customers USAOrganisational requirements €2.19m

The CFTC fined Netrios LP Ltd., incorporated in Saint Lucia, 1,750,000 USD and Maltese Red Acre Ltd. 750,000 USD, totalling 2,500,000 USD. From 2019 to September 2025, Netrios sold a white-label service (website, trading software, margin accounts, execution, back office) through which offshore platforms offered US retail customers who were not eligible contract participants leveraged forex, precious metals, crypto and equity transactions outside a registered exchange; Red Acre assisted with customer support and marketing. The SEC took parallel action over the same conduct. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Technology and service providers share liability if their platform solution enables US retail customers to trade on leverage unlawfully outside registered exchanges.

Authority / court
U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Section 4(a) Commodity Exchange Act (7 U.S.C. § 6(a)); Beihilfe nach Section 13(a) (7 U.S.C. § 13c(a))
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
29 Jun 2026

Original amount 2,500,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Jun 2026 Banque Degroof Petercam SABanque Degroof Petercam: 1 million EUR settlement over hidden costs in employee stock options BelgiumOrganisational requirements €1m

In stock option plans for employees of client companies (2018–2023), the bank did not fully inform the beneficiaries about costs, had initially not recorded the conflicts of interest in this business and assessed clients’ knowledge only with a yes/no question. The Autorité des services et marchés financiers (Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority, FSMA) accepted a settlement of 1 million EUR with publication by name and commitments on cost information.

What organisations can take from it

Full cost transparency and a dedicated conflicts register also apply to ancillary business such as employee stock option plans.

Authority / court
Autorité des services et marchés financiers (FSMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Loi du 2 août 2002; Wohlverhaltensregeln (Loyalität, Kostentransparenz, bestmögliche Ausführung, Interessenkonflikte, Kundenkenntnis)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
Remediation of all deficiencies (appropriateness test, conflicts policy, cost disclosure, waiver of CVA/KVA discounts).
Published
26 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jun 2026 Exmar NVExmar: €350,000 for late disclosure of inside information BelgiumDisclosure and reporting obligations €350,000

The Sanctions Committee of the FSMA (Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority) found that the shipping company Exmar NV, listed on Euronext Brussels, had not disclosed as soon as possible inside information it held on 19 May and 18 June 2020; the information related to a customer's missing payments for the charter of a floating LNG facility. It imposed a fine of 350,000 EUR and ordered publication by name for one year. Exmar has lodged an appeal with the Market Court.

What organisations can take from it

Payment problems of a major customer can be inside information; the ad hoc assessment must be carried out immediately and documented.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ad hoc disclosure: identifying and promptly publishing inside information

Authority / court
Autoriteit voor Financiële Diensten en Markten / Autorité des services et marchés financiers (FSMA) – Sanctiecommissie
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 17 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR); Art. 36 § 2 und Art. 72 § 3 Gesetz vom 2. August 2002 über die Aufsicht über den Finanzsektor
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2026 Bourse Direct SAAMF: EUR 800,000 on online broker Bourse Direct over reporting and monitoring failures FranceDisclosure and reporting obligations €800,000

According to the AMF (Autorité des marchés financiers, French financial markets authority) Enforcement Committee, the online broker Bourse Direct did not properly submit its transaction reports under Art. 26 MiFIR between January 2021 and November 2023 and did not maintain an adequate system to detect and report suspicious orders and transactions under Art. 16(2) MAR. The company received EUR 800,000. The amount covers only the sanction imposed on the company.

What organisations can take from it

Investment firms should regularly test transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance for completeness and effectiveness.

Relevance to training and awareness

Transaction reporting and market abuse surveillance at brokers

Authority / court
Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF), Commission des sanctions
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 26 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 600/2014 (MiFIR); Art. 15 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/590; Art. 16 Abs. 2 Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR); Art. 2, 3 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2016/957
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
50 to 249
Published
25 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2026 VARTA AGVARTA: late ad hoc announcement and missing half-yearly financial report GermanyDisclosure and reporting obligations €620,000

BaFin imposed fines on the battery manufacturer because it had not disclosed inside information without delay and had not published the half-yearly financial report for the 2024 financial year.

What organisations can take from it

Ad hoc assessments and periodic disclosure require fixed responsibilities and deadline controls so that neither inside information nor mandatory reports are left pending.

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 17 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MAR; § 115 Abs. 1 Satz 1 WpHG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Manufacturing and mechanical engineering
Published
1 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Jun 2026 Banque Internationale à Luxembourg S.A.Banque Internationale à Luxembourg: €3.255m ECB penalty for breaching a model decision EU levelOrganisational requirements €3.26m

From 2 October 2023 to 22 October 2024, contrary to a 2023 ECB decision, Banque Internationale à Luxembourg did not apply the newly approved internal models for the expected loss best estimate (ELBE) of defaulted retail and corporate exposures and therefore reported an IRB shortfall to be deducted from Common Equity Tier 1 capital that was too small. The ECB regarded the breach as intentional and severe and imposed 3,255,000 EUR; remedial action was taken into account as mitigating.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory decisions on internal models must be implemented on time, even if the previous approach produces more favourable capital figures.

Relevance to training and awareness

Timely implementation of supervisory decisions

Authority / court
Europäische Zentralbank (EZB), Bankenaufsicht
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 18 Abs. 7 VO (EU) Nr. 1024/2013 (Verstoß gegen einen EZB-Beschluss zu internen Modellen)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
intentional
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial action to alleviate the effects and to prevent future breaches.
Published
29 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Jun 2026 moomoo証券株式会社moomoo Securities: three months without new accounts after false NISA information and AML gaps JapanOrganisational requirements Order

From February to May 2025 the online broker wrongly displayed at least 77 US ETFs and ETNs as eligible for NISA (59 clients traded 25 of them in the tax-advantaged account) and repeated this for a further security after discovery, handled affected clients carelessly and unequally, had since 2024 refused all transfers of holdings to other institutions, carried out no suspicious-transaction assessment for at least 1,531 rejected account applicants and managed cyber and system risks inadequately. Soliciting and accepting new accounts was prohibited from 19 June to 18 September 2026, together with a business improvement order.

What organisations can take from it

A firm that grows fast with account-opening bonuses must scale product approval, complaints handling, suspicious-transaction checks and IT security at the same pace.

Relevance to training and awareness

Accurate product information and suspicious-transaction checks also for rejected clients

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Kanto Local Finance Bureau (関東財務局) auf Empfehlung der Securities and Exchange Surveillance Commission (SESC, 証券取引等監視委員会)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (FIEA, 金融商品取引法) Art. 52 Abs. 1, Art. 51; Art. 38 Nr. 1, Art. 43, Art. 40 Nr. 2 FIEA i. V. m. Art. 123 Abs. 1 Nr. 14 Cabinet Office Order on Financial Instruments Business; Act on Prevention of Transfer of Criminal Proceeds (犯罪収益移転防止法)
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
19 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Jun 2026 HSBC Bank Australia LimitedHSBC Bank Australia: AUD 35m penalty for failing to protect customers from scams AustraliaOrganisational requirements €21.4m

HSBC admitted that from May 2023 to May 2024 it lacked adequate controls against unauthorised payments via its internal transfer channel, that from January 2020 it handled scam reports under the ePayments Code too slowly (144 days on average) and without applying the liability rules, and that until April 2024 it gave affected customers no orderly way back into their accounts. The Court imposed AUD 35 million (AUD 10 million for the fraud controls, AUD 22.5 million for the contraventions relating to the ePayments Code, AUD 2.5 million for restoring account access) and ordered notices on the website, in the app and in letters to customers.

What organisations can take from it

Banks must deploy scam controls on every payment channel and handle scam reports within the deadlines of the applicable rules.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fraud and scam prevention in payments and handling of customer scam reports

Authority / court
Federal Court of Australia (auf Antrag der Australian Securities and Investments Commission, ASIC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
s 912A(1)(a), (5A) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); s 47(1)(a), (4) National Consumer Credit Protection Act 2009 (Cth)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Admissions and jointly proposed penalty; remediation programme with payments of AUD 27,915,700.56 by 21 May 2026; no previous contraventions of a similar nature.
Liability of senior managers
According to the agreed facts, senior management was also aware before May 2023 of heightened fraud risks and gaps in the controls.
Published
18 Jun 2026

Original amount 35,000,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jun 2026 Peken Global Limited (KuCoin)VARA: fine and cease-and-desist order against unlicensed Peken Global (KuCoin) United Arab EmiratesCapital markets and financial supervision Fine

Following VARA investigations, Peken Global Limited, trading as KuCoin, provided virtual asset broker-dealer and/or exchange services to customers in Dubai without a licence. VARA imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered the immediate cessation of all unlicensed activities; other group entities were expressly not affected.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone providing crypto services cross-border to customers in Dubai needs a licence there – regardless of where the platform is based.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing requirement for crypto services in the target market

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Legal basis
Federal Decree Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets; Cabinet Resolution No. 111/2022; VARA Regulations und Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation and full compliance with the measures; intention to go through the licensing process.
Published
24 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jun 2026 Banco BPM S.p.A.; Banco BPM Vita S.p.A.CONSOB fines Banco BPM and BPM Vita €570,000 over delayed disclosure of ECB letter ItalyDisclosure and reporting obligations €570,000

The CONSOB (Italian securities regulator) fined Banco BPM S.p.A. 370,000 EUR, of which 170,000 EUR for late disclosure of inside information under Art. 17(1) MAR and 200,000 EUR for obstructing supervision under Art. 187-quinquiesdecies of the Consolidated Law on Finance (TUF), and fined its subsidiary Banco BPM Vita S.p.A. 200,000 EUR, 570,000 EUR in total. In connection with BPM Vita's tender offer for Anima Holding S.p.A., the bank disclosed an ECB letter of 21 March 2025 rejecting the application of the so-called Danish Compromise to CONSOB and the market only four days later, after two trading days of the acceptance period. Both companies had previously informed CONSOB only incompletely about their discussions with the ECB.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory decisions affecting an ongoing takeover bid must be disclosed to the market and the supervisor at once rather than weighed internally.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ad hoc disclosure and transparency towards the supervisor in takeovers

Authority / court
CONSOB (Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 17 Abs. 1 Verordnung (EU) 596/2014 (MAR); Art. 187-ter.1 und Art. 187-quinquiesdecies Abs. 1 und 1-ter D.Lgs. 58/1998 (TUF)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
negligent
Repeat case
yes
Published
23 Jun 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Jun 2026 Deutsche Bank AktiengesellschaftDeutsche Bank AG: AUD 2m penalty for inaccurate derivative trade reporting AustraliaDisclosure and reporting obligations €1.21m

ASIC issued an infringement notice because on 208 business days between October 2024 and August 2025 Deutsche Bank had not accurately reported the “direction” fields for 20,483 outstanding and 244,091 terminated or matured OTC derivative transactions, mostly foreign exchange trades, to trade repositories. The bank allegedly paid AUD 2 million under the infringement notice; payment is not an admission of guilt.

What organisations can take from it

Derivative reporting systems need plausibility checks on mandatory fields, otherwise individual errors add up to systemic breaches.

Relevance to training and awareness

Data quality in regulatory transaction reporting

Authority / court
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Rule 2.2.6 ASIC Derivative Transaction Rules (Reporting) 2024; reg 7.5A.104 Corporations Regulations 2001
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation with ASIC and measures to prevent further reporting errors.
Published
13 Jul 2026

Original amount 2,000,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jun 2026 A. Tsokkos Hotels Public LimitedCyprus: 16,500 EUR against A. Tsokkos Hotels for late annual financial report CyprusDisclosure and reporting obligations €16,500

The listed hotel group did not publish its 2024 annual financial report on time; the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) imposed a total of 16,500 EUR. At the same meeting, eleven other issuers were fined between 1,500 and 17,000 EUR for the same reason; a fine of 13,500 EUR had already been imposed on the company under the same law in 2025.

What organisations can take from it

Publication deadlines for financial reports are not negotiable – repeated delays lead to fines and, in extreme cases, to suspension of trading.

Authority / court
Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Sec. 9(1), 37(2)(a) Transparency Requirements (Securities Admitted to Trading on a Regulated Market) Law 2007
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Repeat case
yes
Published
7 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2026 Wendelspiess Partners AG in LiquidationFINMA: Wendelspiess Partners breached FIDLEG duties, licence revoked SwitzerlandOrganisational requirements Order

Wendelspiess Partners AG invested almost all the money of its more than 400 clients in a barely diversified foreign fund it had set up and managed itself, which invested mainly in a Zug-based investment company and companies linked to it; it gave insufficient information about conflicts of interest and risks, carried out no suitability check and withheld relevant information from the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (FINMA, Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority). FINMA revoked the licence as an asset manager of the company, which is now bankrupt. Measures against individuals are not set out here. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

In-house funds in client portfolios are a classic conflict of interest that must be disclosed and backed by a documented suitability check.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conflicts of interest with in-house funds; information and suitability duties

Authority / court
Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (FINMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Verhaltenspflichten nach dem Finanzdienstleistungsgesetz (FIDLEG): Interessenkonflikte, Information, Eignungsprüfung; Auskunftspflicht gegenüber der FINMA
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
3 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 5 Oct 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

2 Jun 2026 bunq B.V.AFM: €170,000 fine for bunq over late replies to fraud complaints NetherlandsOrganisational requirements €170,000

On 2 June 2026 the Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM, Dutch Authority for the Financial Markets) fined bunq B.V. 170,000 EUR because in seven cases the bank did not give a substantive reply within the statutory 15 working days to complaints from customers who had fallen victim to online fraud (November to December 2023 and April to at least August 2024). Because bunq fully or largely compensated those affected without being legally obliged to, the AFM lowered the base amount from 500,000 to 200,000 EUR; the simplified settlement brought a further 15% reduction.

What organisations can take from it

Complaint processes for payment services need deadline monitoring, especially for fraud victims with large losses.

Relevance to training and awareness

Timely handling of complaints in payment services

Authority / court
Autoriteit Financiële Markten (AFM)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 43a Abs. 1 i. V. m. Abs. 2 Besluit Gedragstoezicht financiële ondernemingen Wft (BGfo), Umsetzung von Art. 101 PSD2
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Voluntary full or largely full compensation of the customers concerned; simplified settlement (−15%).
Published
8 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 May 2026 mBank S.A.mBank: PLN 14.9m for failings in treasury business and compliance PolandOrganisational requirements €3.52m

The KNF imposed four fines totalling PLN 14,900,000 on mBank: PLN 0.4m and 6m because staff negotiated client transactions with unauthorised third parties and passed client information to them, PLN 5m for not treating currency hedging transactions as financial instruments and PLN 3.5m for ineffective internal control and compliance functions. Following a request for reconsideration, the KNF upheld the decision on 28 August 2026; it is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Staff may negotiate client transactions only with persons whose authority has been verified, and the compliance function must monitor this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Verifying authority and confidentiality in client dealings

Authority / court
Komisja Nadzoru Finansowego (KNF)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
§ 8 Abs. 1 i. V. m. § 26 Nr. 1 Verordnung des Finanzministers vom 24.09.2012; Art. 83b Abs. 3 und 6, Art. 83c Abs. 1 ustawa o obrocie instrumentami finansowymi; Art. 9c Abs. 1 Nr. 4 Prawo bankowe; Art. 21 und 22 Delegierte Verordnung (EU) 2017/565
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 14,900,000 PLN, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 May 2026.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 May 2026 Soltec Power Holdings, SASoltec: incorrect 2023 annual figures reported to the market SpainDisclosure and reporting obligations €190,000

The manufacturer of solar tracking systems disseminated its results for 2023 by way of an "Otra Información Relevante" announcement containing inaccurate information. Spain's National Securities Market Commission (CNMV) imposed a fine of 190,000 EUR for a serious infringement; the company waived administrative appeals.

What organisations can take from it

Voluntary market announcements on results are also subject to MAR – figures must be reconciled before publication.

Authority / court
Comisión Nacional del Mercado de Valores (CNMV)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 297.1.e i. V. m. 297.2.d Ley 6/2023; Art. 17 i. V. m. Art. 7 MAR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities
Published
3 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 May 2026 TGI AGLiechtenstein: FMA halts TGI AG products over deposit-taking without a licence LiechtensteinCapital markets and financial supervision Order

The Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein (FMA, Financial Market Authority) ordered by decree of 26 May 2026 that TGI AG in Vaduz immediately stop distributing and publicly offering its products “Customer Basic 2 %”, “Sales Premium” and “Sofortrabatt”, because it was thereby conducting deposit-taking business without a licence, and that it no longer hold the customer funds received in this way within four months. In a partial decision of 12 August 2026 the FMA's appeals commission granted suspensive effect only for the order concerning the holding of the funds; the other measures remain in force and the proceedings are not final.

What organisations can take from it

Business models in which customer money is taken in and later repaid must be checked for a licensing requirement of the financial regulator before launch.

Relevance to training and awareness

Licensing requirement when accepting customer funds (deposit-taking)

Authority / court
Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein (FMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
28 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 May 2026 Robomarkets LtdCyprus: Robomarkets pays 100,000 EUR under settlement over CFD sales to retail clients CyprusOrganisational requirements €100,000

For the period June 2023 to June 2024, the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) examined the investment firm’s organisational requirements, client information, appropriateness assessment and compliance with the restrictions on marketing CFDs to retail investors. The proceedings were concluded with a settlement of 100,000 EUR, which the company has already paid.

What organisations can take from it

When selling CFDs to retail clients, the appropriateness assessment and product intervention rules are central points of supervisory scrutiny.

Relevance to training and awareness

Appropriateness assessment when selling complex products

Authority / court
Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Art. 22(1), 25(1), 26(3) Gesetz über Wertpapierdienstleistungen 2017; Art. 42 VO (EU) 600/2014; CySEC-Richtlinie DI87-09; Art. 37(4) CySEC-Gesetz
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
24 Aug 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 May 2026 Havenport Investments Pte LtdMAS: composition fine for Havenport Investments SingaporeOrganisational requirements €26,855

The fund manager Havenport Investments Pte Ltd lacked an adequate framework for managing the risks of the assets under its management, breached its base capital requirement without reporting this to the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS, Singapore's central bank and financial regulator), and violated conditions of its Capital Markets Services Licence requiring prior approval for a new product and personalised advice from independent financial advisers for retail investors before onboarding. MAS allegedly imposed a composition fine of SGD 40,000; the company has ceased its retail fund management business and has not been allowed to manage retail investors' money since 18 July 2024. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

Licence conditions and capital requirements belong in ongoing compliance monitoring by senior management; any shortfall must be reported immediately.

Relevance to training and awareness

Senior management duties regarding licence conditions, capital requirements and reporting to the regulator

Authority / court
Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Securities and Futures Act (SFA) und zugehörige Regulations; Auflagen der Capital Markets Services Licence
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
18 May 2026

Original amount 40,000 SGD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 May 2026 Oma Säästöpankki OyjOma Säästöpankki: 400,000 EUR over late and incomplete insider lists FinlandMarket abuse and insider dealing €400,000

The bank failed to draw up insider lists in good time for two pieces of inside information (termination of the core banking project with Cognizant in 2021, merger talks with Liedon Säästöpankki in 2022), did not update them and omitted mandatory information. The Finanssivalvonta (Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority, FIN-FSA) imposed a total fine of 400,000 EUR; the decision was not appealed and is final.

What organisations can take from it

Insider lists must be created from the moment inside information exists – a fixed process with designated responsible persons prevents gaps.

Relevance to training and awareness

Insider lists and handling of inside information

Authority / court
Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR) Art. 18 Abs. 1, 3 und 4; Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/347
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Measures to prevent recurrence and partial admission/cooperation had a mitigating effect.
Published
15 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 May 2026 Pareto Securities AbPareto Securities: EUR 115,000 for gaps and duplicate filings in transaction reporting FinlandDisclosure and reporting obligations €115,000

The Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA, Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority) imposed a penalty payment of 115,000 EUR on Pareto Securities Ab. The firm had submitted no transaction reports at all on 71 days in 2024 and 20 days in 2025, and between June 2023 and May 2025 it reported 13 transactions an unusually high number of times, most of them more than 300 times. The admission of the failings reduced the amount.

What organisations can take from it

Automated reporting pipelines need controls that detect outages and duplicates immediately.

Relevance to training and awareness

Monitoring automated reporting pipelines

Authority / court
Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
Art. 26 Abs. 1 UAbs. 1 MiFIR (VO (EU) Nr. 600/2014); Sijoituspalvelulaki 15 luku 2 § 7 mom. 5 kohta; FivaL 40 §, 41 §
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Admission of the failings and cooperation with the supervisor.
Published
13 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

5 May 2026 P&V Assurances SCP&V Assurances: 150,000 EUR – distribution via a deregistered insurance intermediary BelgiumOrganisational requirements €150,000

One of the insurer’s intermediaries was removed from the FSMA register in December 2023; owing to a human data entry error in the monitoring tool, P&V only noticed this after more than a month and concluded 34 contracts through him during that time. The Autorité des services et marchés financiers (Belgian Financial Services and Markets Authority, FSMA) accepted a settlement of 150,000 EUR; there had already been a settlement for the same amount in 2020.

What organisations can take from it

Automated register checks are only as good as the underlying data maintenance – critical entries require a four-eyes principle.

Relevance to training and awareness

Care in master data maintenance / register reconciliation

Authority / court
Autorité des services et marchés financiers (FSMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Loi du 4 avril 2014 relative aux assurances, Art. 259
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
IT adjustments to prevent recurrence.
Published
5 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 May 2026 Swiss Fund Management AG in Liquidation; BZ Berater Zentrum AGFINMA revokes Swiss Fund Management's licence and confiscates BZ commissions SwitzerlandOrganisational requirements Order

Swiss Fund Management AG in liquidation and BZ Berater Zentrum AG, which held around 2,000 asset management mandates, channelled investor money of around CHF 200 million, directly or via funds, into illiquid bonds of interlinked issuers that financed real estate projects of related companies, without adequately informing investors about the conflicts of interest and without adequate suitability and appropriateness checks under FIDLEG (Swiss Financial Services Act). By ruling of 1 May 2026 the Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (FINMA, Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority) revoked SFM's licence as a manager of collective assets, rejected BZ's application for a licence as an asset manager and confiscated placement commissions of more than CHF 3 million from BZ. The ruling is final.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone steering client money into products of related companies must disclose the conflicts of interest and document a suitability check for each client.

Relevance to training and awareness

Conflicts of interest and suitability checks in asset management

Authority / court
Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (FINMA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Organisational requirements
Legal basis
Verhaltensregeln nach dem Finanzdienstleistungsgesetz (FIDLEG): Interessenkonflikte, Eignungs- und Angemessenheitsprüfung
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
29 Jun 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

28 Apr 2026 Canva Pty Ltd; Canva Operations Pty Limited; Canva Trading Pty Ltd; Fusion Books Pty LtdCanva group: AUD 792,000 in penalties for late annual financial reports AustraliaDisclosure and reporting obligations €485,086

Four Australian companies of the Canva group did not lodge their financial reports for the 2024 financial year with ASIC by the due date of 30 April 2025; the consolidated report followed only on 27 March 2026. ASIC issued an infringement notice of allegedly AUD 198,000 to each company (AUD 792,000 in total); the notices were paid, which is not an admission of guilt.

What organisations can take from it

Even fast-growing technology groups must monitor the reporting deadlines of every single group company.

Relevance to training and awareness

Lodgement deadlines for the financial reports of all group companies

Authority / court
Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
s 319(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth); Bußgeldbescheide nach s 1317DAM
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Published
6 May 2026

Original amount 792,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 20 more of 243

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial