Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€470,000Total of monetary amounts
€400,000Largest single case: Oma Säästöpankki Oyj
€235,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA) €470,000 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by topic
  1. Market abuse and insider dealing €400,000 85 % · 1 case
  2. Disclosure and reporting obligations €70,000 15 % · 1 case

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance €470,000 100 % · 2 cases

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20261€70,000
Q2 20261€400,000
Q3 20260—

2 cases

13 May 2026 Oma Säästöpankki OyjOma Säästöpankki: 400,000 EUR over late and incomplete insider lists FinlandMarket abuse and insider dealing €400,000

The bank failed to draw up insider lists in good time for two pieces of inside information (termination of the core banking project with Cognizant in 2021, merger talks with Liedon Säästöpankki in 2022), did not update them and omitted mandatory information. The Finanssivalvonta (Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority, FIN-FSA) imposed a total fine of 400,000 EUR; the decision was not appealed and is final.

What organisations can take from it

Insider lists must be created from the moment inside information exists – a fixed process with designated responsible persons prevents gaps.

Relevance to training and awareness

Insider lists and handling of inside information

Authority / court
Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Market abuse and insider dealing
Legal basis
Verordnung (EU) Nr. 596/2014 (MAR) Art. 18 Abs. 1, 3 und 4; Durchführungsverordnung (EU) 2016/347
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Measures to prevent recurrence and partial admission/cooperation had a mitigating effect.
Published
15 May 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Mar 2026 Familiam Asset Management OyFamiliam Asset Management: 70,000 EUR for 2,867 unreported securities transactions FinlandDisclosure and reporting obligations €70,000

Between September 2021 and August 2023, the asset manager failed to report a total of 2,867 transactions to the supervisory authority on time and in 2024 also submitted quarterly reports (FINREP) late. The Finanssivalvonta (Finnish Financial Supervisory Authority, FIN-FSA) imposed a total fine of 70,000 EUR; the admission had a mitigating effect.

What organisations can take from it

Reporting obligations require deadline monitoring with a deputy arrangement – especially in small firms without their own reporting department.

Relevance to training and awareness

Regulatory reporting

Authority / court
Finanssivalvonta (FIN-FSA)
Area of law
Capital markets and financial supervision · Disclosure and reporting obligations
Legal basis
MiFIR (VO (EU) 600/2014) Art. 26 Abs. 1; IFR (VO (EU) 2019/2033) Art. 54 Abs. 1; FIN-FSA-Vorschriften 20/2013 (FINREP)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Admission of the failures / cooperation.
Published
25 Mar 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial