Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

3cases from 2 jurisdictions
€12.3mTotal of monetary amounts
€11mLargest single case: The London Metal Exchange (LME)
€789,284Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. USA 2 cases 67 % · €1.29m
  2. United Kingdom 1 case 33 % · €11m

What for?

by action
  1. Fine 3 cases 100 % · €12.3m

Who?

by sector

All sectors

  1. Financial services and insurance 3 cases 100 % · €12.3m

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€789,284
Q1 20251€11m
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20260—
Q3 20261€501,614

3 cases

22 Sep 2026 OTC Link LLCOTC Link: 575,000 USD – security policies never completed despite examination findings USACritical infrastructure €501,614

From 2016 to 2025, the operator of the OTC Link ATS trading system lacked complete policies on systems security, access control and vulnerability management as required under Regulation SCI. Although the examiners of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had criticised the gaps in several examinations, drafts remained unfinished; the SEC issued a censure and imposed 575,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Track supervisory examination findings with a deadline and a responsible person – points that remain open repeatedly become expensive.

Authority / court
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
Legal basis
Regulation SCI, Rule 1001(a)(1)–(3)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes

Original amount 575,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

20 Mar 2025 The London Metal Exchange (LME)London Metal Exchange: 9.2 million GBP – controls and escalation failed in nickel turmoil United KingdomCritical infrastructure €11m

When the nickel price rose to over 100,000 USD within just over an hour on 8 March 2022, only junior staff were on duty during Asian trading hours, and they had not been trained to recognise a disorderly market; they did not escalate and even switched off price bands. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) imposed a fine on the recognised investment exchange for the first time: 9.2 million GBP after a 30% discount.

What organisations can take from it

Critical infrastructure needs trained staff around the clock and clear escalation paths – including at night and at off-peak times.

Relevance to training and awareness

Escalation of unusual market conditions; training of shift staff

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
Legal basis
FCA REC 2.5.1 (Recognition Requirements); Art. 18 RTS 7 (MiFID II)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Early settlement (30% discount); improvements since March 2022.

Original amount 9,200,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Oct 2024 Tradition SEF LLCTradition SEF: 875,000 USD – emergency and security tests not brought before the board USACritical infrastructure €789,284

The swap trading platform did not fully inform its board of the results of emergency, technology risk and penetration tests, did not regularly test its business continuity and disaster recovery capabilities and had no adequate risk management. It also failed to produce documents requested during an examination on time despite extensions of deadlines; the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) imposed 875,000 USD.

What organisations can take from it

Contingency plans only count if they are tested regularly and the results are noted by the entire governing body.

Authority / court
Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)
Area of law
Information security and cyber · Critical infrastructure
Legal basis
Commodity Exchange Act; CFTC-Regeln zu System Safeguards für Swap Execution Facilities
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 875,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Oct 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial