Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

Whistleblower protection Public sector Obec Sološnica Clear all filters

1case from 1 jurisdiction

€200Total of monetary amounts

€200Largest single case: Obec Sološnica

€200Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

by amount by number of cases

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

EU €200 100 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic

Missing or inadequate reporting channel €200 100 % · 1 case

Who?

by company

When?

per quarter, by date of decision

Trend
Period	Cases	Total
Q3 2023	0	—
Q4 2023	0	—
Q1 2024	0	—
Q2 2024	0	—
Q3 2024	0	—
Q4 2024	0	—
Q1 2025	1	€200
Q2 2025	0	—
Q3 2025	0	—
Q4 2025	0	—
Q1 2026	0	—
Q2 2026	0	—
Q3 2026	0	—

1 case

Newest first Highest amounts

14 Feb 2025 Obec SološnicaMunicipality of Sološnica: 200 EUR – contradictory reporting rules and missing information on protection SlovakiaMissing or inadequate reporting channel €200

The municipality did not publish any information on the protection available to whistleblowers and at times had two valid, contradictory sets of rules on the internal reporting procedure online without stating which applied. The Office imposed a fine of 200 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Reporting rules must be unambiguous and up to date – remove outdated versions from the internet.

Authority / court: Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov (Slowakisches Amt für Hinweisgeberschutz)
Area of law: Whistleblower protection · Missing or inadequate reporting channel
Legal basis: Zákon č. 54/2019 Z. z. o ochrane oznamovateľov protispoločenskej činnosti, § 10 Abs. 5, § 19 Abs. 2
Action: Fine
Status of proceedings: unknown
Sector: Public sector

Sources

ÚOO, Rozhodnutie vom 14.02.2025 (UOO-178/2025), Obec Sološnica Decision of an authority
Úrad na ochranu oznamovateľov: Rozhodnutia úradu (Liste der Entscheidungen) Official register or notice

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

How the radar is compiled

Official sources only

Every case is based on a decision, press release or database of an authority or a court. Press and law-firm reports count at most as additional references.

Four-eyes check

Whoever enters a case may not approve it. A second, independent check compares company, date, amount and area of law with the source. Only then is the case published.

Comparable amounts

Amounts are converted at the ECB reference rate on the day of the decision. Each case also shows the original amount.

Corrections on record

A correction is a new version that is checked again. Every change is logged. You can report errors directly on each case.

Case texts are translated from the German original. Where a translation is not yet available, the German text is shown and marked “(German original)”. Names of authorities, laws and companies are given as in the source.

The radar reports on published decisions and is not legal advice. Decisions that are not yet final are marked as such where the status is known.

Embed the radar on your website

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Ready for training that sticks?