Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

293cases from 38 jurisdictions
€2.42bnTotal of monetary amounts (272 cases with an amount)
€272.8mLargest single case: two Australian casino operators
€500,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
202213€394m
202358€683m
202461€369.1m
2025108€690.8m
202653€281.6m

293 cases

16 Sep 2026 Wallester ASFinancial supervisor orders Wallester to remedy governance and AML deficiencies EstoniaInternal controls Order

Following an on-site inspection, the Finantsinspektsioon (Estonian Financial Supervision Authority) issued an order requiring the payment institution Wallester to remedy, by 31 December, deficiencies in governance and control functions (separation of the lines of defence, internal rules), in safeguarding customer funds and in the staffing of its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing function. Date = publication of the press release.

What organisations can take from it

Fast-growing payment service providers must let their compliance, AML and internal audit functions grow with them in terms of staffing and organisation.

Authority / court
Finantsinspektsioon (Estnische Finanzaufsicht)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Aufsichtsrechtliche Anordnung (ettekirjutus) der Finantsinspektsioon
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
16 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Sep 2026 Capitec Bank LimitedCapitec Bank: ZAR 28m for failings in customer due diligence and training South AfricaCustomer due diligence €1.49m

Following a 2023 inspection, the supervisor found inadequate customer due diligence and inadequate enhanced and ongoing due diligence in sampled files, no ongoing training for sampled employees and gaps in the risk management and compliance programme, such as name and payment screening manuals that had not been approved by management before being implemented, and inadequately documented arrangements for terrorist property reporting and financial sanctions. Five cautions and penalties of 28 million ZAR were imposed, of which 5.5 million ZAR is suspended for 36 months from 13 October 2025; the bank had already been sanctioned with 56.25 million ZAR in December 2024. The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

A bank that has already been sanctioned will be judged at the next inspection on full implementation – due diligence and training must demonstrably be in place.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ongoing due diligence and regular anti-money laundering training

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Prudential Authority (PA) der South African Reserve Bank
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Sections 21, 21A und 21C i. V. m. 42(1), 42(2)(d), (e), (g) sowie Sections 42 und 43 Financial Intelligence Centre Act 38 of 2001
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
Cooperation in remedying the deficiencies; 5.5 million ZAR suspended for 36 months.
Published
11 Sep 2026

Original amount 28,000,000 ZAR, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

31 Aug 2026 EM@NEY P.L.C.Malta: EM@NEY pays 97,622 EUR under settlement for late bank account register reports MaltaMoney laundering and terrorist financing €97,622

The financial institution did not deliver on time the data due every seven days to the Centralised Bank Account Register (CBAR). The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 162,704 EUR, which was reduced by 40% to 97,622 EUR under a settlement pursuant to its 2026 settlement policy.

What organisations can take from it

Recurring mandatory reports need deadline monitoring with escalation – otherwise individual omissions add up to six-figure sums.

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing
Legal basis
Reg. 4(2), 8, 9 CBAR Regulations (S.L. 373.03)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction
Published
4 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 MiFinity Malta LimitedMalta: MiFinity pays 160,099 EUR following anti-money laundering examination MaltaCustomer due diligence €160,099

At the payment institution, the customer risk assessment had only been introduced after business had started, some customers remained unassessed, and customer profiles were based on transaction thresholds rather than on risk. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) set a fine of 266,833 EUR and a follow-up directive; under a settlement, the fine was reduced by 40% to 160,099 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

A customer risk assessment belongs before business starts, not in a later remediation project.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based customer profiles and source of funds

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 2(1), 5(5)(a)(ii), 7(1)(c), 7(2)(a), 21, 22 PMLFTR
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement with 40% reduction; remediation demonstrated
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Wise Europe SAWise Europe: NBB order and public statement over customer due diligence failures BelgiumCustomer due diligence Order

The Banque nationale de Belgique (National Bank of Belgium) found serious anti-money laundering due diligence failures at Wise Europe SA, including in identifying and verifying customers and beneficial owners, ongoing monitoring of business relationships, analysis of atypical transactions and intra-group information sharing. It made public that Wise Europe had not complied with an order of 8 July 2025 to meet these obligations by 31 March 2026, and ordered full compliance by 31 January 2027 at the latest; no fine was published.

What organisations can take from it

Letting a supervisory deadline to remedy KYC failures lapse risks new orders and public naming.

Relevance to training and awareness

KYC and transaction monitoring at payment service providers

Authority / court
Banque nationale de Belgique / Nationale Bank van België (BNB/NBB)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Art. 13 § 1, 23, 26, 27, 35 § 1 und 45 Gesetz vom 18. September 2017 zur Verhinderung von Geldwäsche; Anordnung nach Art. 93 § 1 1°, Veröffentlichung nach Art. 93 § 2 1° und Art. 98/1 i. V. m. 135 § 3
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
25 Aug 2026

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

21 Aug 2026 Bank oder Finanzinstitut (anonymisiert)Liechtenstein: CHF 50,000 fine for due diligence and sanctions screening failures LiechtensteinCustomer due diligence €53,459

The Finanzmarktaufsicht (FMA, Liechtenstein Financial Market Authority) fined an unnamed legal person CHF 50,000 for breaches of the Sorgfaltspflichtgesetz (Due Diligence Act) – business profiles not established or updated as required, group-wide application of the due diligence standard not ensured – and of the Gesetz über die Durchsetzung internationaler Sanktionen (ISG, Act on the Enforcement of International Sanctions). The ISG provision relied on makes it an offence punishable by a fine not to carry out the sanctions screening of customer and transaction documents, or to carry it out improperly or late.

What organisations can take from it

Sanctions screening of customers and transactions must be complete and timely, and in groups the due diligence standard must also be applied at branches and subsidiaries.

Relevance to training and awareness

Sanctions screening of customers and transactions and group-wide due diligence standards

Authority / court
Finanzmarktaufsicht Liechtenstein (FMA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Art. 31 Abs. 1 Bst. e und k Sorgfaltspflichtgesetz (SPG); Art. 11 Abs. 1a Bst. c Gesetz über die Durchsetzung internationaler Sanktionen (ISG)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance

Original amount 50,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 Aug 2026 QuinnBet (Gibraltar) LimitedQuinnBet: £415,986 over anti-money laundering and financial vulnerability check failings United KingdomInternal controls €485,256

The operator of quinnbet.com will pay £415,986 in lieu of a financial penalty to the Consolidated Fund (the UK Government's general account) under a settlement and contribute to the Commission's investigation costs. The settlement also includes a disgorgement of £193,118, which is not included in the amount shown. A compliance assessment found breaches of the anti-money laundering licence condition LC 12.1.1 paras. 2 and 3 (March 2023 to August 2025) and of the customer interaction requirements under SRCP 3.4.3; following an error during a platform migration, some of the required financial vulnerability checks under SRCP 3.4.4 were also not carried out between February and May 2025. It is the first enforcement action against the company.

What organisations can take from it

Financial vulnerability checks are a licence requirement that must continue without gaps, including during technical changeovers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Financial vulnerability checks and AML controls in online betting

Authority / court
Gambling Commission
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
s. 116 Gambling Act 2005; LC 12.1.1 Abs. 2 und 3, SRCP 3.4.3 und SRCP 3.4.4 Abs. 1 der Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
No previous enforcement action, a swift action plan, full cooperation, early voluntary reporting of some of the failings, voluntary divestment of the funds gained from them and early acceptance of the failings.
Published
20 Aug 2026

Original amount 415,986 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 Aug 2026 Banco Genial S.A.Banco Genial: BRL 21.56m for anti-money laundering failings in FX business BrazilCustomer due diligence €3.62m

The Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador (COPAS, sanctions decision committee) of the Banco Central do Brasil (Brazilian central bank) fined Banco Genial S.A. a total of BRL 21,560,000.00: BRL 4,200,000.00 for inadequate anti-money laundering policies, procedures and controls, BRL 8,920,000.00 for failing to verify the credentials of foreign exchange clients and BRL 8,440,000.00 for failing to file suspicious activity reports with the financial intelligence unit Coaf in the proper form and on time. According to the case documents, the reporting charge concerned 1,364 foreign exchange transactions for the acquisition of virtual assets with five clients between November 2020 and October 2021, totalling USD 744,341,982.45.

What organisations can take from it

Foreign exchange transactions for buying crypto-assets require checks on clients' financial capacity and timely suspicious activity reports.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer due diligence and suspicious activity reporting in FX and crypto business

Authority / court
Banco Central do Brasil (Comitê de Decisão de Processo Administrativo Sancionador – COPAS)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Lei nº 9.613/1998, Art. 10 III, Art. 11 und 12; Lei nº 13.506/2017; Circular BCB nº 3.978/2020; Resolução CMN nº 3.568/2008
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.

Original amount 21,560,000 BRL, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

11 Aug 2026 Panzer Norge ASPanzer Norge AS: NOK 100,000 for AML failures at an accounting firm NorwayCustomer due diligence €9,115

Finanstilsynet (Norwegian Financial Supervisory Authority) fined the accounting firm Panzer Norge AS, based in Alta, NOK 100,000 under the Anti-Money Laundering Act. The inspection found shortcomings in the firm-wide risk assessment and in customer due diligence, as well as further breaches in risk and quality management and in engagement agreements; the company, which had five employees, essentially did not dispute the breaches.

What organisations can take from it

Small accounting firms are also subject to anti-money laundering obligations and need a documented risk assessment and demonstrable customer due diligence for every engagement.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money laundering obligations for accounting and advisory firms

Authority / court
Finanstilsynet
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§§ 7, 8, 9, 12 Abs. 4, 13 Abs. 1, 3 und 4, 14, 24 und 49 hvitvaskingsloven
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Employees
Under 50
Culpability
negligent
Published
17 Sep 2026

Original amount 100,000 NOK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Aug 2026 Your Neighbourhood Credit Union LimitedFINTRAC: CAD 16,500 penalty on Your Neighbourhood Credit Union Limited for one violation of anti-money laundering obligations CanadaInternal controls €10,243

According to FINTRAC, Your Neighbourhood Credit Union Limited is a provincially regulated credit union based in Kitchener, Ontario. Canada's anti-money laundering regulator FINTRAC imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CAD 16,500 on the company on 10 August 2026. According to FINTRAC's findings, made during a compliance examination, the company committed one violation of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA) and its regulations. As described by the regulator, the violation concerned written compliance policies and procedures. According to FINTRAC, the penalty has been paid in full and the case is closed. Source: FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada), "Administrative monetary penalty on Your Neighbourhood Credit Union Limited", published 24 September 2026, https://fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/pen/amps/pen-2026-09-24-2-eng; summarised in our own words; not an official version and not a reproduction of the original.

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
PCMLTFA s. 9.6(1); PCMLTF Regulations 156(1)(b); Verwaltungsgeldbuße nach Teil 4.1 PCMLTFA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
24 Sep 2026

Original amount 16,500 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Aug 2026 UBS Financial Services Inc.FinCEN: 125 million USD against UBS Financial Services as a repeat offender USAInternal controls €108.4m

The US Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) imposed 125 million USD on the broker-dealer – the highest BSA penalty against a broker-dealer to date. UBSFS admitted wilful infringements: the AML programme was inadequate, more than 50,000 foreign currency transfers totalling more than 10 billion USD were not adequately monitored and suspicious activity reports were not filed; it is already the second enforcement action after 2018.

What organisations can take from it

Monitoring gaps left unremedied after an earlier enforcement action lead, the second time round, to a multiple of the original penalty.

Authority / court
Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Bank Secrecy Act (BSA)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Mitigating circumstances
Up to 15 million USD (remaining amount due by 31 May 2028) may be waived to the extent that UBSFS bears the costs of the independent review of its AML programme and implements its recommendations
Published
3 Aug 2026

Original amount 125,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Jul 2026 Banque Lombard Odier & Cie SAFederal Criminal Court fines Banque Lombard Odier CHF 3 million over money laundering SwitzerlandInternal controls €3.23m

The Bundesstrafgericht (Federal Criminal Court) found Banque Lombard Odier & Cie SA guilty of failing to take adequate organisational measures against aggravated money laundering by a former relationship manager who in 2011 and 2012 handled accounts of a criminal organisation holding proceeds of corruption in the Uzbek telecommunications market; despite warning signs, the bank's anti-money-laundering functions did not sufficiently ensure that the origin and purpose of the funds were investigated and documented. The bank was fined CHF 3,000,000 and bears procedural costs of CHF 24,561.49; it was acquitted on the remaining charges, and proceedings for acts before 27 July 2011 were dismissed as time-barred. The judgment is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Warning signs about the origin of large inflows must be investigated and documented by the anti-money-laundering function itself, not just by the relationship manager.

Relevance to training and awareness

Anti-money-laundering: investigating conspicuous inflows and documentation

Authority / court
Bundesstrafgericht (Strafkammer), Anklage der Bundesanwaltschaft
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
Art. 102 Abs. 2 StGB i.V.m. Art. 305bis Ziff. 1 und 2 StGB (Urteil SK.2023.42)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
The long time elapsed since the offences (2011/2012) was taken into account as mitigating.
Published
27 Jul 2026

Original amount 3,000,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 2 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jul 2026 The New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming CorporationFINTRAC: CAD 399,712.50 penalty on The New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming Corporation for one violation of anti-money laundering obligations CanadaSuspicious activity reports €249,415

According to FINTRAC, The New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming Corporation is a reporting entity in the casino sector based in Fredericton, New Brunswick. Canada's anti-money laundering regulator FINTRAC imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CAD 399,712.50 on the company on 24 July 2026. According to FINTRAC's findings, made during a compliance examination, the company committed one violation of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA) and its regulations. As described by the regulator, the violation concerned suspicious transaction reporting. According to FINTRAC, the penalty has been paid in full and the case is closed. Source: FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada), "Administrative monetary penalty on the New Brunswick Lotteries and Gaming Corporation", published 3 September 2026, https://fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/pen/amps/pen-2026-09-03-2-eng; summarised in our own words; not an official version and not a reproduction of the original.

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
PCMLTFA s. 7; Verwaltungsgeldbuße nach Teil 4.1 PCMLTFA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Published
3 Sep 2026

Original amount 399,712.5 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jul 2026 Shelbit General Trading L.L.CVARA sanctions Shelbit again for unlicensed crypto services, missing KYC and promotion United Arab EmiratesCustomer due diligence Fine

Despite a cease-and-desist notice and enforcement action of 2 January 2025, the Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA, Dubai's virtual assets regulator) found that Shelbit General Trading L.L.C (Shelbit Exchange) continued to provide virtual asset services in and from Dubai without a licence, onboarded users without the mandatory KYC checks and promoted its services without authorisation. VARA again imposed fines of an undisclosed amount and ordered it to cease immediately; according to the regulator, the risk identified also concerned cross-border transactions with possible consequences for the integrity of the UAE financial system.

What organisations can take from it

Disregarding a cease-and-desist order leads to further sanctions – the regulator keeps monitoring the market after the first action.

Relevance to training and awareness

Compliance with cease-and-desist orders and KYC obligations

Authority / court
Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), Dubai
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Federal Decree-Law No. (10) of 2025 (AML/CFT/PF); Cabinet Resolution No. (111) of 2022; Dubai Law No. (4) of 2022 Regulating Virtual Assets in the Emirate of Dubai; VARA Regulations and Rulebooks
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
24 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2026 Evolution Malta Holding LimitedEvolution: £4.75m because its own games ran on unlicensed sites accessible in GB United KingdomInternal controls €5.57m

The games supplier will pay £4,750,000 in lieu of a financial penalty under a regulatory settlement, contribute to the Commission's investigation costs and accept an additional licence condition requiring an independent audit within twelve months. Five genuine Evolution games were accessible at scale to consumers in Great Britain via six websites of two operators not licensed by the Gambling Commission; between April 2024 and January 2025, its risk assessment and its anti-money laundering policies and controls did not adequately address risks arising from business partners in particular (LC 12.1.1, LC 12.1.2). After the Commission notified it in December 2024, Evolution immediately and permanently blocked the games for users in Great Britain.

What organisations can take from it

B2B suppliers must monitor where their products are actually offered and stop their use by unlicensed operators.

Relevance to training and awareness

Control over the distribution of own products to unlicensed operators

Authority / court
Gambling Commission
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Internal controls
Legal basis
s. 116 Gambling Act 2005; LC 12.1.1 Abs. 1–3 und LC 12.1.2 der Licence Conditions and Codes of Practice (LCCP); Reg. 18, 19(1)(a) und 28(1) Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Mitigating circumstances
A swift action plan with progress updates, full cooperation with the investigation and early acceptance of the failings.
Published
23 Jul 2026

Original amount 4,750,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2026 Caisse populaire acadienne ltéeFINTRAC: CAD 676,500 penalty on Caisse populaire acadienne ltée for 3 violations of anti-money laundering obligations CanadaSuspicious activity reports €421,916

According to FINTRAC, Caisse populaire acadienne ltée is a federally regulated credit union based in Caraquet, New Brunswick. Canada's anti-money laundering regulator FINTRAC imposed an administrative monetary penalty of CAD 676,500 on the company on 23 July 2026. According to FINTRAC's findings, made during a compliance examination, the company committed 3 violations of the Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA) and its regulations. As described by the regulator, the violations concerned suspicious transaction reporting, written compliance policies and procedures and assessing and documenting money laundering and terrorist financing risks. Specifically, according to FINTRAC, the credit union failed in four instances to report multiple transactions that showed indicators of suspicion. According to FINTRAC, the penalty has been paid in full and the case is closed. Source: FINTRAC (Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada), "Administrative monetary penalty on Caisse populaire acadienne ltée", published 24 September 2026, https://fintrac-canafe.canada.ca/pen/amps/pen-2026-09-24-4-eng; summarised in our own words; not an official version and not a reproduction of the original.

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
PCMLTFA s. 7, 9.6(1); PCMLTF Regulations 156(1)(b), 156(1)(c), 156(2); Verwaltungsgeldbuße nach Teil 4.1 PCMLTFA
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
24 Sep 2026

Original amount 676,500 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2026 Nova Scotia Gaming CorporationFINTRAC: 231,826 CAD against Nova Scotia Gaming over missing suspicious transaction reports CanadaSuspicious activity reports €144,584

The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) imposed 231,826 CAD on the Halifax gaming corporation (casino sector) because it failed to file suspicious transaction reports on attempted transactions despite reasonable grounds for suspicion, did not keep its compliance policies up to date and approved by a senior officer, and did not assess the money laundering risk as required. The penalty was paid in full.

What organisations can take from it

Even aborted or merely attempted transactions can be reportable – cashier staff must know this.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious transaction reports even for merely attempted transactions

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Part 1, und zugehörige Verordnungen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Published
3 Sep 2026

Original amount 231,826 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

14 Jul 2026 Goldwin LtdMalta: 80,907 EUR against online casino Goldwin for missing customer risk assessment MaltaCustomer due diligence €80,907

The 2022 examination revealed that for more than two years the remote gaming operator had had no proper customer risk assessment for almost its entire player base; the assessments submitted had been prepared specifically for the examination. In addition, once players reached the deposit threshold of 2,000 EUR, it did not check in good time whether they were politically exposed persons. The Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU) imposed 80,907 EUR; the fine was still open to appeal at the time of publication.

What organisations can take from it

Supervisory authorities see through risk assessments prepared only for the examination – they must be applied in day-to-day business.

Relevance to training and awareness

Risk-based customer assessment in gambling

Authority / court
Financial Intelligence Analysis Unit (FIAU)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Reg. 5(5)(a)(ii), 11(5), 21 PMLFTR; FIAU Implementing Procedures Part I und II (Remote Gaming)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
16 Jul 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Jul 2026 Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss eGBaFin: 210,000 EUR against Volksbank Düsseldorf Neuss over monitoring and reporting gaps GermanyCustomer due diligence €210,000

Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed fines totalling 210,000 EUR on the cooperative bank: business relationships were not monitored on an ongoing basis or with enhanced scrutiny, additional information was not obtained and suspicious activity reports were not filed or were filed late. The function of the money laundering reporting officer had been outsourced to an external service provider with several clients.

What organisations can take from it

Institutions that outsource the anti-money laundering function remain responsible themselves for ongoing monitoring and timely suspicious activity reports.

Relevance to training and awareness

Ongoing monitoring of business relationships and suspicious activity reporting

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 20, 36, 38 und 69 GwG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
17 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jun 2026 Banca Popolare Commerciale SpaBanca d'Italia: 40,000 EUR against Banca Popolare Commerciale over AML deficiencies ItalyCustomer due diligence €40,000

Following an on-site inspection from February to April 2025, the Bank of Italy (Banca d'Italia) found deficiencies in customer due diligence, active cooperation (suspicious transaction reporting) and anti-money laundering controls, and imposed an administrative fine of 40,000 EUR. The duration of the deficiencies and the corrective measures initiated were taken into account.

What organisations can take from it

Gaps in customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reporting are consistently sanctioned after on-site inspections, even with smaller amounts – corrective measures reduce the sanction but do not replace it.

Relevance to training and awareness

Customer due diligence and suspicious transaction reports

Authority / court
Banca d'Italia
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Customer due diligence
Legal basis
Art. 62 d.lgs. 231/2007; Verstöße gegen Art. 7, 16–19, 24, 25, 35, 36 d.lgs. 231/2007
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Corrective measures initiated

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 20 more of 273

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial