Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 5 jurisdictions
€174.3mTotal of monetary amounts
€108.1mLargest single case: Xeltox Enterprises Ltd. (Cryptomus)
€3.91mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231€130,215
Q1 20241€4.01m
Q2 20241€9.2m
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20252€7.39m
Q4 20252€153.1m
Q1 20261€434,295
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

8 cases

27 Mar 2026 13010431 Canada Inc. (Necosmart)FINTRAC: 693,742 CAD against crypto service provider Necosmart over missing suspicious transaction reports CanadaSuspicious activity reports €434,295

The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) imposed 693,742.50 CAD on the Edmonton money services business, which also exchanges virtual currencies, for five violations: repeated failure to file suspicious transaction reports, lack of written compliance policies, insufficient enhanced measures for high-risk transactions, lack of a risk assessment and incomplete records of occupation and transactions for crypto exchanges.

What organisations can take from it

Small crypto exchange offices need the same basic framework as banks: risk analysis, policies, enhanced scrutiny and reporting.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising and reporting grounds for suspicion in crypto exchange

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Part 1, und zugehörige Verordnungen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
14 May 2026

Original amount 693,742.5 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Oct 2025 Xeltox Enterprises Ltd. (Cryptomus)FINTRAC: record penalty of 177 million CAD against crypto payment service Cryptomus CanadaSuspicious activity reports €108.1m

The Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC) imposed 176,960,190 CAD on the crypto payment service registered in British Columbia. In July 2024 alone, 1,068 suspicious transaction reports were not filed – including on transactions linked to child sexual abuse material, fraud, ransomware and sanctions evasion – as well as 1,518 reports of large virtual currency transactions; in addition, there were violations of a ministerial directive and a lack of policies and risk assessment. The company has appealed to the Federal Court.

What organisations can take from it

Crypto services without a functioning reporting system are sanctioned per report not filed – the total can threaten their existence.

Authority / court
Financial Transactions and Reports Analysis Centre of Canada (FINTRAC)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, Part 1, und zugehörige Verordnungen
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
22 Oct 2025

Original amount 176,960,190 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

13 Oct 2025 J.P. Morgan SEBaFin: 45 million EUR against J.P. Morgan SE over late suspicious activity reports GermanySuspicious activity reports €45m

By decision of 13 October 2025 (final since 30 October 2025), Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 45 million EUR on J.P. Morgan SE because the institution had culpably breached its duty of supervision in the internal processes for filing money laundering suspicious activity reports; from 4 October 2021 to 30 September 2022, suspicious activity reports were systematically not filed on time. BaFin points out that, in the case of systematic infringements, the amount of the fine can be based on the institution's total turnover.

What organisations can take from it

File suspicious activity reports without delay – systematic backlogs in the reporting process are themselves an infringement, and the fine can then be calculated on the basis of the institution's total turnover.

Relevance to training and awareness

Filing money laundering suspicious activity reports without delay

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
§ 130 Abs. 1 OWiG (Aufsichtspflichtverletzung) i. V. m. Pflichten nach dem GwG (Verdachtsmeldungen); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
6 Nov 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Aug 2025 Varengold Bank AGBaFin: 3.3 million EUR fine and penalty payment against Varengold Bank GermanySuspicious activity reports €3.8m

By decision of 22 August 2025, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 3.3 million EUR because the bank systematically filed suspicious activity reports late from June 2023 to March 2025; in February 2025, a penalty payment of 500,000 EUR had already been imposed for failure to comply with a 2023 order concerning Iran-related transactions (total 3.8 million EUR). In addition, in July 2025 BaFin ordered comprehensive remediation of the deficiencies in money laundering prevention, with an action plan and reporting obligations.

What organisations can take from it

Failing to implement a supervisory order risks penalty payments and a comprehensive package of measures in addition to the fine.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious activity reports and handling of high-risk transactions

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Bußgeld: § 56 Abs. 1 S. 1 Nr. 69, Abs. 3 GwG; Anordnung: § 51 Abs. 2 GwG, § 44 Abs. 1 KWG; Zwangsgeld: § 14 VwVG i. V. m. § 17 FinDAG; Bekanntmachung nach § 57 Abs. 1 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
yes
Published
16 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jul 2025 Wise US, Inc.Six US states: 4.2 million USD against Wise US over AML programme deficiencies USA, NYSuspicious activity reports €3.59m

In a coordinated multistate proceeding brought by six states – the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) with the supervisory authorities of CA, MN, NE, TX and MA – the money transmitter must pay 4.2 million USD. An examination (July 2022 to September 2023) found, among other things, a lack of independent AML reviews at an appropriate frequency, late suspicious activity reports, data quality problems in transaction monitoring and unremedied earlier findings; Wise does not admit any legal infringements and must conduct a lookback.

What organisations can take from it

Remedy findings from earlier examinations and audits on time – otherwise they become a ground for sanctions in their own right.

Authority / court
New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) mit den Aufsichtsbehörden von CA, MN, NE, TX und MA
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Bundes- und einzelstaatliches Recht zu Geldtransfer und BSA/AML (u. a. 31 CFR 1022.320)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Remedial measures already initiated and lookback
Published
9 Jul 2025

Original amount 4,200,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jul 2025.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

24 Apr 2024 N26 Bank AGBaFin: 9.2 million EUR against N26 over systematically late suspicious activity reports GermanySuspicious activity reports €9.2m

By final decision of 24 April 2024, Germany's Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin) imposed a fine of 9.2 million EUR on the neobank because it had systematically filed money laundering suspicious activity reports late in 2022.

What organisations can take from it

Send suspicious activity reports to the FIU without delay – systematically late reporting risks fines running into millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious activity reports without delay

Authority / court
Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht (BaFin)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1 Nr. 69, Abs. 3 GwG (verspätete Verdachtsmeldungen, § 43 Abs. 1 GwG); Bekanntmachung nach § 57 GwG
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
21 May 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Mar 2024 Banque Audi (Suisse) SAFINMA confiscates 3.9 million CHF in profits from Banque Audi (Suisse) SwitzerlandSuspicious activity reports €4.01m

The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) found serious infringements of anti-money laundering rules in PEP relationships: insufficient clarification of the origin of assets, failure to report to the reporting office despite unexplained transaction purposes and a serious breach of the duty to provide information, because a critical internal audit report was not handed over. It confiscated 3.9 million CHF in profits, imposed a capital surcharge of 19 million CHF and a two-year ban on new PEP and high-risk relationships (date of the announcement used as decision date).

What organisations can take from it

Withholding critical audit reports from the supervisory authority considerably aggravates a money laundering case.

Relevance to training and awareness

PEP clarifications and openness towards the supervisory authority

Authority / court
Eidgenössische Finanzmarktaufsicht (FINMA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Schweizer Geldwäschereirecht; Gewinneinziehung und Auskunftspflicht nach Finanzmarktaufsichtsrecht (laut FINMA)
Action
Disgorgement of profits
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Published
25 Mar 2024

Original amount 3,900,000 CHF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Mar 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

21 Nov 2023 OTP Bank Nyrt.OTP Bank: 49.4 million HUF over late suspicious transaction reports HungarySuspicious activity reports €130,215

The bank did not report several suspicious cases to the financial intelligence unit without delay, its monitoring produced delayed hits owing to incorrectly set filter parameters, and its risk assessment, customer due diligence and documentation of anti-money laundering training showed deficiencies. The Magyar Nemzeti Bank (Central Bank of Hungary, MNB) imposed a total of 49.375 million HUF and set deadlines for remediation by August 2024.

What organisations can take from it

Validate monitoring parameters regularly – and training is expressly among the obligations that are inspected.

Relevance to training and awareness

Recognising and reporting suspected money laundering in good time

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Magyar Nemzeti Bank (MNB)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
Ungarisches Geldwäschegesetz (Pmt.); Beschluss H-PM-I-B-76/2023
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Employees
10,000 or more
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
The bank had already initiated remedial measures for several of the infringements.
Published
21 Nov 2023

Original amount 49,375,000 HUF, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Nov 2023.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial