Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific: 1,838 cases from 37 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 1 jurisdiction
€589,190Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€589,190Largest single case: Qian DuoDuo Limited
€589,190Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by authority
  1. Auckland District Court (Anklage: Department of Internal Affairs) €589,190 100 % · 1 case
  2. Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) – 0 % · 1 case

What for?

by topic
  1. Suspicious activity reports €589,190 100 % · 1 case
  2. no topic – 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. Qian DuoDuo Limited €589,190 100 % · 1 case
  2. NZForex Limited – 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20240–
Q1 20251–
Q2 20251€589,190
Q3 20250–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

2 cases

28 Apr 2025 Qian DuoDuo LimitedQian DuoDuo: 1,125,000 NZD – transfers of over 19 million NZD not reported New ZealandSuspicious activity reports €589,190

Between June 2018 and September 2019 the Auckland money remitter and foreign exchange provider (trading as Lidong Foreign Exchange) failed to report 197 transfers to China totalling more than 19.14 million NZD: 26 suspicious activities (4.72 million NZD) and 171 prescribed transactions (14.42 million NZD); it checked the source of funds of the two individuals through whom the transactions were conducted only on the basis of questionable documents. On 28 April 2025 the Auckland District Court imposed a fine of 1,125,000 NZD. The company has appealed the decision. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Suspicious activity reports and prescribed transaction reports are subject to deadlines – failing to verify the source of funds robustly risks penalties running into millions.

Relevance to training and awareness

Suspicious activity reporting and source-of-funds checks

Authority / court
Auckland District Court (Anklage: Department of Internal Affairs)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing · Suspicious activity reports
Legal basis
AML/CFT Act 2009, ss 48A(1), 97 (Meldung vorgeschriebener Transaktionen) und s 92(1)(b)(i) (Verdachtsmeldung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
5 Jun 2025

Original amount 1,125,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 28 Apr 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Mar 2025 NZForex LimitedNZForex: formal warning over 3,182 unreported transactions New ZealandMoney laundering and terrorist financing Reprimand or warning

The company disclosed to the DIA (Department of Internal Affairs, New Zealand's AML/CFT supervisor) that, because of a system error in its prescribed transaction reporting, 3,182 transactions not denominated in New Zealand dollars had not been reported to the Police Financial Intelligence Unit between November 2017 and February 2024. On 18 March 2025 the DIA issued a formal warning under the AML/CFT Act 2009 and, given the prompt voluntary disclosure, refrained from more serious action; NZForex must provide the final report of an independent audit and report on its remediation.

What organisations can take from it

Reporting processes for prescribed transactions need regular reconciliation so that system errors do not go unnoticed for years; early self-reporting can substantially reduce the sanction.

Relevance to training and awareness

Complete reporting of prescribed transactions to the FIU

Authority / court
Department of Internal Affairs (DIA)
Area of law
Money laundering and terrorist financing
Legal basis
Anti-Money Laundering and Countering Financing of Terrorism Act 2009 (Meldung vorgeschriebener Transaktionen)
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Mitigating circumstances
Prompt voluntary disclosure, admission of fault, fixing the system error, reporting all outstanding transactions and a voluntary independent audit.
Published
18 Mar 2025

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial