Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

8cases from 7 jurisdictions
€48mTotal of monetary amounts (6 cases with an amount)
€45mLargest single case: Vodafone GmbH
€600,000Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20241€5,363
Q1 20250—
Q2 20252€45.7m
Q3 20250—
Q4 20252€2.2m
Q1 20261€125,083
Q2 20262—
Q3 20260—

8 cases

4 May 2026 Berliner Verkehrsbetriebe (BVG) AöRBlnBDI reprimands BVG: deletion at service provider not checked, data breach reported too late GermanyData processors Reprimand or warning

A processor of Berlin's public transport operator BVG, which had sent customer letters in early 2025, was hacked; around 180,000 customer records were affected, although they should long since have been deleted after the end of the contract. BVG had never checked the deletion, had not agreed any procedure for data breaches in the data processing agreement and reported the incident only after the 72-hour deadline had expired; the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BlnBDI) issued a reprimand.

What organisations can take from it

Have service providers prove deletion after the end of the contract, and have an internal procedure that immediately turns indications of a breach into a 72-hour notification.

Relevance to training and awareness

Reporting process for data breaches and management of service providers

Authority / court
Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit (BlnBDI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 2 i. V. m. Abs. 1 lit. c, e, f, Art. 28 Abs. 3 S. 2 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1, Art. 33 DSGVO
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Transport, logistics and shipping
Mitigating circumstances
BVG has announced measures against similar incidents.
Published
4 May 2026
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

16 Apr 2026 Fullgevity OÜ (vormals OÜ Dr Mõttus Hambaravi)Fullgevity (dental clinic) must reorganise data processing in Invisalign treatment EstoniaData processors Order

The starting point was a complaint about incomplete disclosure of patient data; the clinic left several requests from the supervisory authority unanswered. The Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, AKI) ordered it to revise its contracts with Align Technology (Invisalign) with regard to the GDPR roles (Art. 26/28 GDPR), to adapt the consent form and the privacy notices in accordance with Art. 7, 9, 13 and 14 GDPR and to publish them in Estonian; non-compliance is subject to a penalty payment of 1,000 EUR per item.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone passing patient data on to manufacturers or platforms must clarify roles, contracts and consents properly in advance – and respond to supervisory requests on time.

Relevance to training and awareness

Consent and transparency for health data; cooperation with the supervisory authority

Authority / court
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (AKI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1 IKS; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d DSGVO i. V. m. Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, 7, 9, 13, 14, 26, 28 DSGVO
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Healthcare

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Mar 2026 RENAULT COMMERCIAL ROUMANIE S.R.L.Cyber attack via service provider – Renault Commercial Roumanie pays 125,000 EUR RomaniaData processors €125,083

In an attack on an application operated by a processor, data of a very large number of persons (including personal identification numbers, driving licence and identity card numbers, vehicle identification numbers) were stolen and published. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) criticised the lack of security measures and effectiveness testing as well as the selection of a service provider without sufficient guarantees and imposed 637,262.50 lei (125,000 EUR).

What organisations can take from it

Responsibility for customer data does not end with the service provider – check its security guarantees in advance and monitor them continuously.

Authority / court
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und d, Abs. 2 i. V. m. Art. 28 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Automotive
Published
25 Mar 2026

Original amount 637,262.5 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Mar 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Dec 2025 Nexpublica FranceCNIL: 1.7 million EUR against processor Nexpublica over security flaws FranceData processors €1.7m

As a processor, Nexpublica developed and operated the case management software ‘Public CRM’ for the disability authority MDPH Nord. Following two data breaches in 2022, audits revealed critical vulnerabilities that had existed since 2021, such as outdated SHA-1 hashing; the French data protection authority (CNIL) imposed 1.7 million EUR directly on the service provider.

What organisations can take from it

Processors are themselves liable for the data security of their software; do not leave known vulnerabilities unaddressed until the next breach.

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Dec 2025 Curenergía Comercializador de Último Recurso, S.A.U.AEPD: 500,000 EUR against energy supplier Curenergía after misdirected message in dual chat SpainData processors €500,000

An employee of the customer service provider was serving two customers in chat at the same time and assigned one customer's e-mail address to the other; as a result, the complainant received the name, debts and billing data of a stranger. The Spanish data protection authority (Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, AEPD) saw the cause in the process design, which allowed parallel chats, and imposed 500,000 EUR for lack of data protection by design; the request for reconsideration was rejected.

What organisations can take from it

Design service channels so that mix-ups between customers are technically harder – an individual error can be an organisational failure.

Relevance to training and awareness

Diligence in customer service / misdirected messages

Authority / court
Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 25 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Energy and utilities

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Jun 2025 Vodafone – Πάναφον Α.Ε.Ε.Τ.Greece: 700,000 EUR against Vodafone over prepaid numbers registered in other people’s names GreeceData processors €700,000

Using a customer’s identity card, an unknown person registered at least 15 prepaid numbers in her name at a Vodafone partner shop. By Decision 27/2025, the Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) imposed on Vodafone 350,000 EUR (processing by a processor, Art. 28), 200,000 EUR (accuracy of data) and 150,000 EUR under the Greek ePrivacy law, and issued a reprimand requiring the company to secure the activation of new numbers technically within three months (for example by sending an SMS to the existing customer); the shop (Karampelas K. & Sia E.E., ‘DS Phone’) received 40,000 EUR.

What organisations can take from it

Identity checks in branch and partner distribution are a data protection issue – providers are liable for weak processes of their distribution partners.

Relevance to training and awareness

Identity verification when concluding contracts in partner distribution

Authority / court
Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. d, Art. 28 Abs. 1 und 3 DSGVO; Art. 12 Gesetz 3471/2006
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

3 Jun 2025 Vodafone GmbHBfDI: 45 million EUR against Vodafone over fraud in partner agencies and authentication gaps GermanyData processors €45m

Malicious employees in partner agencies that broker contracts for Vodafone had created fictitious contracts and contract changes to the detriment of customers. The German Federal Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BfDI) imposed 15 million EUR for inadequate vetting and monitoring of the partner agencies (Art. 28) and 30 million EUR for authentication deficiencies in ‘MeinVodafone’ in combination with the hotline, through which unauthorised persons were able, among other things, to retrieve eSIM profiles; in addition, a reprimand was issued under Art. 32.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that outsource sales to partner agencies must audit how those agencies handle customer data and make misuse technically harder.

Relevance to training and awareness

Insider threats and oversight of sales partners

Authority / court
Bundesbeauftragte für den Datenschutz und die Informationsfreiheit (BfDI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 28 Abs. 1 S. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Mitigating circumstances
Full cooperation including self-incrimination, modernisation of systems, separation from fraudulent partners; fines accepted and paid, plus donations amounting to millions.
Published
3 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Nov 2024 Uptime-IT ApSDenmark: 40,000 DKK against IT service provider with unusable backups after ransomware DenmarkData processors €5,363

As processor for a chiropractic practice, the IT service provider had encrypted backups without securing the key; after a ransomware attack in 2020, patient data including health information and CPR numbers could not be restored. The Danish data protection authority (Datatilsynet) reported the company to the police and proposed 50,000 DKK; the court sentenced it to a fine of 40,000 DKK on 12 November 2024.

What organisations can take from it

A backup only counts if restoration is tested regularly – including access to the keys.

Authority / court
Dänisches Gericht auf Anzeige der Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Data processors
Legal basis
Art. 32 DSGVO; Auftragsverarbeitungsvertrag
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software

Original amount 40,000 DKK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 Nov 2024.

Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial