Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by countryWhat for?
by topic- International data transfers €924.5m 46 % · 5 cases
- Cookies and tracking €477.3m 24 % · 9 cases
- Data breaches and data security €407.6m 20 % · 42 cases
- Marketing and consent €98m 5 % · 9 cases
- Data processors €48m 2 % · 8 cases
- Data subject rights and transparency €26.9m 1 % · 30 cases
- Employee data €20.3m 1 % · 12 cases
- Video surveillance €1.74m 0 % · 11 cases
- no topic €617,568 0 % · 11 cases
Who?
by sectorAll sectors
- Media and online platforms €1.21bn 60 % · 14 cases
- Transport, logistics and shipping €413.3m 21 % · 11 cases
- Retail and e-commerce €152.8m 8 % · 11 cases
- Telecoms, IT and software €111m 6 % · 17 cases
- Energy and utilities €80.1m 4 % · 7 cases
- Financial services and insurance €20.2m 1 % · 21 cases
- Other €13.3m 1 % · 16 cases
- Public sector €6.45m 0 % · 13 cases
- Healthcare €782,999 0 % · 15 cases
- Construction and real estate €204,275 0 % · 5 cases
- 4 more€342,182
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 3 | €5.49m |
| Q1 2024 | 4 | €82.3m |
| Q2 2024 | 3 | €13.9m |
| Q3 2024 | 8 | €386m |
| Q4 2024 | 18 | €261.9m |
| Q1 2025 | 9 | €343,078 |
| Q2 2025 | 13 | €577.5m |
| Q3 2025 | 14 | €477.9m |
| Q4 2025 | 18 | €26.8m |
| Q1 2026 | 16 | €49.5m |
| Q2 2026 | 18 | €116.3m |
| Q3 2026 | 13 | €7.03m |
137 cases
22 Sep 2026 Miljödata i Karlskrona AktiebolagIMY: 1.8 million SEK against HR software provider Miljödata after data leak €160,053
The provider of web-based systems for sickness reporting, rehabilitation and occupational safety incidents was hacked in August 2025; the stolen personal data appeared on the dark web shortly afterwards. The Swedish data protection authority (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, IMY) found that, despite the high need for protection, there were no adequate security measures and no automatic real-time monitoring for attacks, assessed this as negligent and imposed 1,800,000 SEK.
Service providers hosting the health and personnel data of many employers need real-time attack detection, not just perimeter protection.
- Authority / court
- Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 22 Sep 2026
Original amount 1,800,000 SEK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Sep 2026.
- IMY Tillsyn: Miljödata i Karlskrona AB Press release of an authority
- Beslut efter tillsyn enligt dataskyddsförordningen – Miljödata i Karlskrona Aktiebolag (IMY-2025-21177) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Sep 2026 Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria, S.A. – Niederlassung Italien (BBVA Italia)Garante: 5.5 million EUR against BBVA Italia over advertising despite objection €5.51m
For seven months (October 2025 to May 2026), the bank continued to send a customer advertising via its app, although he had objected several times. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) also found deficient systems for implementing objections and inaccurate information about the processing, and imposed 5,508,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 613).
An objection to advertising must take effect immediately and reliably across all channels – including app messages.
- Authority / court
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 12, 21, 24 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 11 Sep 2026
- Newsletter del 11 settembre 2026 – Garante privacy Press release of an authority
- Provvedimento n. 613 del 3 settembre 2026 (BBVA Italia) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Sep 2026 Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale (ASUFC)Garante: Udine hospital group pays 24,000 EUR for viewing a colleague's patient record €24,000
Hospital staff opened a colleague's electronic health record to organise duty rosters during Covid rather than for treatment purposes. Technical barriers limiting access to treating staff were lacking; the Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) imposed 24,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 616).
Patient records may only be opened for treatment – include this in training and secure it technically through role-based rights and logging.
Purpose limitation when accessing patient records
- Authority / court
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, b, c, f, Art. 9, 25, 32 DSGVO; Art. 75 Codice privacy; Linee guida dossier sanitario
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Published
- 11 Sep 2026
- Newsletter del 11 settembre 2026 – Garante privacy Press release of an authority
- Garante privacy, azienda sanitaria di Udine sanzionata per 24mila euro Press release of an authority
- Garante – Provvedimento n. 616 del 3 settembre 2026 [10293994] (ASUFC) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
3 Sep 2026 ASIS – Azienda Speciale per la gestione degli Impianti Sportivi (Trento)Garante: 8,000 EUR for cameras in swimming pool changing rooms of a Trentino sports operator €8,000
Since 2007, the municipal sports facilities operator had had cameras in the changing rooms of a swimming pool that recorded the locker area. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) found no sound legal basis, incomplete notices and a 72-hour retention period not justified by a necessity assessment, and imposed 8,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 619); the cameras were removed during the proceedings.
Changing rooms and comparably intimate areas are off limits for video surveillance – even when theft prevention is the motive.
- Authority / court
- Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. c und e DSGVO; Art. 2-ter Codice privacy
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Public sector
- Published
- 11 Sep 2026
- Newsletter del 11 settembre 2026 – Garante privacy Press release of an authority
- Garante – Provvedimento n. 619 del 3 settembre 2026 [10294255] (ASIS Trento) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
25 Aug 2026 Health Service Executive (HSE)Irish health service HSE: 645,000 EUR for neglected paper patient records €645,000
In 2023, intruders gained access to two former psychiatric hospitals and posted videos of the patient records stored there online. An inspection of twelve sites found records with mould, water and animal damage in unsuitable rooms, up to and including shipping containers. Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) imposed a fine of 645,000 EUR, issued a reprimand and ordered audits and the relocation of records.
Data protection also applies to paper archives in disused buildings – retention requires an inventory, erasure periods and physical security.
Physical security and retention of paper records
- Authority / court
- Data Protection Commission (DPC)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e und f, 32 Abs. 1, 33 Abs. 1, 34 Abs. 1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Public sector
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Published
- 2 Sep 2026
- Data Protection Commission announces Final Decision following Inquiry into the Health Service Executive (HSE) Press release of an authority
- EDPB – DPC announces Final Decision following Inquiry into the HSE Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Aug 2026 Poliserv JG (PJG) SRLPhishing on admin account – Poliserv JG must pay 3,000 EUR €2,998
Attackers obtained the credentials of a user account with administrator rights through phishing and accessed customer data. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) criticised the lack of technical and organisational measures and of regular effectiveness testing, imposed 15,728 lei (3,000 EUR) and ordered regular employee training, including on recognising phishing e-mails. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Admin accounts need MFA, and all employees must be able to recognise phishing – the supervisory authority now expressly orders training.
Phishing recognition, protection of privileged accounts
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 19 Aug 2026
Original amount 15,728 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Aug 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 19.08.2026 (Poliserv JG (PJG) SRL) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
6 Aug 2026 AMATO BESTSELLER S.R.L.AMATO BESTSELLER: 45,000 EUR plus 50,000 lei for data access and robocalls €54,316
Following several complaints, the Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (Romanian data protection authority, ANSPDCP) found that current and former employees, untrained and without procedural rules, had access to extensive data (including health, family and income data), that data subjects were not informed under Art. 14 GDPR, that excessive data were collected and that automated advertising calls were made without consent. Fines: 78,465 lei (15,000 EUR, Art. 32(4)), 52,310 lei (10,000 EUR, Art. 14), 104,620 lei (20,000 EUR, Art. 5/9 GDPR) and 50,000 lei (Law 506/2004); in addition, an order to provide regular employee training. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in June 2026.
Anyone giving employees access to sensitive customer data must train them and limit access on a need-to-know basis.
Training employees in handling customer data; consent for advertising calls
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c i. V. m. Art. 9, Art. 14, Art. 32 Abs. 4 DSGVO; Art. 12 Abs. 1 Gesetz 506/2004
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 6 Aug 2026
Original amount 285,395 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Aug 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 06.08.2026 (AMATO BESTSELLER S.R.L.) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
21 Jul 2026 Hôpital Privé de la LoireHôpital Privé de la Loire: 500,000 EUR after data exfiltration affecting over 520,000 patients €500,000
In summer 2025, an attacker gained access to the private hospital's electronic patient record system and obtained data on 524,867 patients and 202,246 trusted persons. There was no VPN or multi-factor authentication for external users, no appropriate access control and no detection of suspicious activity; the trusted persons were not notified. France's data protection authority (Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés, CNIL) imposed a fine of 500,000 EUR (SAN-2026-009).
External access to patient records belongs behind multi-factor authentication and continuous monitoring for unusual access.
Access security and attack detection in hospitals
- Authority / court
- Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 32, Art. 34
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Published
- 3 Sep 2026
- Sanction : amende de 500 000 euros à l'encontre de l'Hôpital Privé de la Loire Press release of an authority
- Délibération SAN-2026-009 du 21 juillet 2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
17 Jul 2026 Orange România SAOrange România pays 100,000 EUR after app errors and hacked ticketing system €99,969
A synchronisation error between two applications allowed a customer to retrieve other customers’ invoices in the mobile app; in addition, the ticketing platform, which was publicly accessible without VPN, MFA or IP restriction, was attacked and a very large data set (including copies of identity documents, card data, IBANs) was exfiltrated. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed fines of 104,780 lei (20,000 EUR, Art. 25) and 419,120 lei (80,000 EUR, Art. 32), a total of 523,900 lei, and ordered test and change management. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Never expose internal platforms to the internet without VPN/MFA; software changes to linked systems need testing before go-live.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 25 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und d, Abs. 2 und 4 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Telecoms, IT and software
- Published
- 17 Jul 2026
Original amount 523,900 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 17.07.2026 (Orange România SA) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 Jul 2026 Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Θεσσαλονίκης Γ. Γεννηματάς «Ο Άγιος Δημήτριος» (Allgemeines Krankenhaus Thessaloniki G. Gennimatas – Agios Dimitrios)Thessaloniki hospital: 25,000 EUR because surgery lists with diagnoses were online €25,000
From May to the end of August 2024, the public hospital accidentally published on its website a surgery list containing patients' telephone numbers, illnesses and planned procedures; a member of the public found the document via Google. The Hellenic Data Protection Authority imposed a total of 25,000 EUR: 10,000 EUR for inadequate security, 2,000 EUR for the late notification, 10,000 EUR for failing to notify the data subjects and 3,000 EUR for missing contact details of the data protection officer (DPO).
Every publication on the website needs an approval step that reliably intercepts documents containing health data – and after a data breach, data subjects must be informed.
Publication of documents containing health data
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, 32 Abs. 1, 33 Abs. 1, 34 Abs. 1, 12, 13 i. V. m. 37 (Entscheidung 13/2026)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Healthcare
- Επιβολή προστίμου σε νοσοκομείο (Απόφαση 13/2026) Decision of an authority
- Απόφαση 13/2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
7 Jul 2026 Unternehmen mit drei Dienstfahrzeugen (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Administrative Court upholds ban on continuous GPS tracking of three company vehicles Order
The data protection authority had prohibited a company from tracking its three company vehicles continuously by GPS and ordered the data to be erased; narrow purposes such as theft protection while parked remained permitted. The Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (Administrative Court of the Republic of Slovenia) upheld this and clarified that employee consent bundled with other declarations is invalid.
Employee consent rarely supports monitoring – and never when it is bundled with other declarations in the form.
Consent and proportionality in employee monitoring
- Authority / court
- Upravno sodišče Republike Slovenije (bekanntgemacht durch den Informacijski pooblaščenec)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 7 Abs. 2 DSGVO
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Transport, logistics and shipping
- Published
- 7 Jul 2026
- Upravno sodišče znova potrdilo prakso IP: sistematično GPS sledenje zaposlenim ni dopustno brez tehtnega razloga Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
2 Jul 2026 Banca Transilvania S.A.Employee retrieves account statements for a third party – Banca Transilvania pays 5,000 EUR €5,002
At the request of a third party and outside the scope of his duties, a bank employee retrieved account statements of a data subject (name, IBAN, transactions, balances). The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) found insufficient technical and organisational measures and imposed 26,172 lei (5,000 EUR); the bank has paid the fine. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Access logs and clear rules against ‘favour queries’ are a duty for every bank.
Access to customer data for business purposes only; handling requests from third parties
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 Abs. 1, 2 und 4 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Financial services and insurance
- Published
- 2 Jul 2026
Original amount 26,172 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Jul 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 02.07.2026 (Banca Transilvania S.A.) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
2 Jul 2026 SIA 4YOU MEBELESFurniture retailer 4YOU MEBELES ignores cookie inspection – first a reprimand, then 1,000 EUR €1,000
In a targeted inspection of cookies on company websites, the Datu valsts inspekcija (Latvian Data State Inspectorate, DVI) found fault with the site 4mebeles.lv. After a reprimand in February 2026, the company claimed that the deficiencies had been remedied, which a further inspection disproved; further requests for information went unanswered. The DVI imposed 1,000 EUR for failure to cooperate and requested the missing information by 3 August 2026.
Assurances given to the supervisory authority are checked – false statements and silence aggravate the sanction.
Cookie banners and cooperation with the supervisory authority
- Authority / court
- Datu valsts inspekcija (DVI)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Cookies and tracking
- Legal basis
- Art. 58 Abs. 1, Art. 83 Abs. 5 lit. e DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Culpability
- intentional
- Repeat case
- yes
- DVI Lēmums Par soda piemērošanu (SIA 4YOU MEBELES), 02.07.2026 Decision of an authority
- Datu valsts inspekcija – Lēmumi (Liste der veröffentlichten Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2026 Ö Aktiengesellschaft (in der Entscheidung abgekürzt; Adressverlag und Direktwerbeunternehmen)VwGH sets data protection fine for party affinities definitively at 13 million EUR €13m
The company had stored statistically calculated ‘party affinities’ for around 2.2 million people and in some cases sold them to advertising clients – special categories of personal data without consent; in addition, parcel frequency data was further processed for incompatible purposes. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) had imposed 18 million EUR in 2019 and the Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) 16 million EUR in 2024; Austria's Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH) has now set the fine with final effect at 13 million EUR (plus 100,000 EUR in procedural costs).
Calculated characteristics such as political leanings are themselves special categories – companies that derive them for advertising need explicit consent.
- Authority / court
- Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Ausgangsbescheid: Datenschutzbehörde)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und b, Art. 6 Abs. 4, Art. 9 Abs. 1 (VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Comprehensive cooperation, deletion of the party affinities, settlements with data subjects, long duration of proceedings (5 years, 10 months).
- Published
- 16 Jul 2026
- VwGH 24.06.2026, Ro 2025/04/0007 Court decision
- VwGH bestätigt unrechtmäßige Verarbeitung von Partei-Affinitäten und setzt Geldbuße mit EUR 13 Mio. fest Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Jun 2026 Securitas Sverige AktiebolagSecuritas Sverige: reprimand over cameras in company vehicles without legal basis Reprimand or warning
The security services provider used cameras in vehicles through which personal data was processed without any legal basis for doing so. The Swedish data protection authority (Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten, IMY) issued a reprimand under Art. 58 GDPR; no fine was imposed.
Dashcams in company cars also need a verified legal basis and a balancing against the interests of employees and passers-by.
Use of cameras in vehicles
- Authority / court
- Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 6 Abs. 1
- Action
- Reprimand or warning
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Defence and security
- IMY – Tillsyn Securitas Sverige Aktiebolag Decision of an authority
- IMY – Beslut Securitas Sverige AB Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Jun 2026 SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.Stranger in Kaufland CCTV room – service provider SSG Select Solutions pays 2,000 EUR €1,948
An employee of the service provider acting as processor for Kaufland România let a third party into a store’s video surveillance room; that person filmed the images and distributed them on social media. Kaufland reported the incident. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed 10,200 lei (2,000 EUR) on the processor and ordered additional checks of the work instructions; the fine has been paid. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in April 2026.
Anyone with access to surveillance rooms must know: video footage is confidential, and third parties have no access there.
Access to surveillance rooms; staff bound by instructions
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- Art. 29, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b, Abs. 2 und 4 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 15 Jun 2026
Original amount 10,200 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jun 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 15.06.2026 (SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Jun 2026 Verkkokauppa.com OyjKHO confirms fine against Verkkokauppa.com over customer accounts without time limit €792,639
The online retailer had not set a retention period for customer accounts and kept data until customers requested deletion; purchases were only possible with an account. The sanctions board of the Finnish Data Protection Ombudsman imposed 856,000 EUR in 2024, the administrative court reduced the fine to 792,639 EUR on the basis of current turnover, and the Supreme Administrative Court (Korkein hallinto-oikeus, KHO) confirmed this on 12 June 2026.
Do not leave deletion to the customer – every online shop needs defined retention periods for accounts and order data.
- Authority / court
- Korkein hallinto-oikeus (KHO); Sanktionsgremium des Datenschutzbeauftragten
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Published
- 18 Jun 2026
- Supreme Administrative Court upholds the administrative fine imposed on Verkkokauppa.com Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
12 Jun 2026 Μάρκετ Ιν ΑΕΒΕ (Market In)Greece: 95,000 EUR against supermarket chain Market In over video footage €95,000
A data subject complained about the disclosure of footage from the supermarket chain’s video surveillance and about the inadequate response to his access request. The Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) found that Market In had passed the video footage to the judicial authorities without informing the data subject beforehand, processed more data than necessary, failed to comply with the right of access and failed to cooperate with the authority, and by Decision 10/2026 imposed a total of 95,000 EUR (50,000 EUR for lawfulness/transparency, 20,000 EUR each for data minimisation and the right of access, 5,000 EUR for failure to cooperate); in the same proceedings, ΜΕΔΕ ΑΕ received 65,000 EUR.
Release video footage only for a specific purpose – and anyone ignoring requests from the supervisory authority pays extra.
Handling video footage and access requests
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, c, Art. 5 Abs. 2, Art. 12, 13, 15, 31 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Retail and e-commerce
- Απόφαση 10/2026 της Αρχής Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Jun 2026 Deutsche Wohnen SELG Berlin I confirms GDPR infringement by Deutsche Wohnen through tenant archive without deletion function Fine
In 2019, the Berlin Commissioner for Data Protection and Freedom of Information (BlnBDI) had imposed 14.5 million EUR on the housing group because tenant data such as salary statements, bank statements and social security data were held in an archive system with no means of deletion. Following the 2023 CJEU judgment on direct corporate liability, the Berlin Regional Court (Landgericht Berlin I) confirmed on 9 June 2026 infringements of data minimisation and storage limitation; the press release does not state the amount of the fine set by the court.
Ensure that archive and filing systems can technically implement deletion periods from the outset – ‘privacy by design’ is subject to fines.
- Authority / court
- Landgericht Berlin I (Bußgeldbehörde: Berliner Beauftragte für Datenschutz und Informationsfreiheit)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 5, Art. 25 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Construction and real estate
- Liability of senior managers
- According to the CJEU (C-807/21), a breach of duty by a person in a management position need not be proven for the corporate fine.
- Published
- 10 Jun 2026
- Landgericht Berlin bestätigt Verstoß der Deutsche Wohnen SE gegen die DSGVO Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Jun 2026 Εταιρεία Προμήθειας Αερίου Θεσσαλονίκης Θεσσαλίας Α.Ε. („ZeniΘ“) und Τράπεζα Πειραιώς Α.Ε. (Piraeus Bank)Greece: 110,000 EUR against energy supplier ZENITH and Piraeus Bank (right of access) €110,000
Due to errors by a processor of the energy supplier, incorrect details of a direct debit mandate were recorded, so that three bills instead of one were debited from the customer's account; call recordings and the mandate form had not been retained. ZENITH responded inadequately to the access request and did not correct the data (100,000 EUR), while Piraeus Bank infringed the right of access (10,000 EUR and a reprimand); Decision No. 8/2026 of the Hellenic Data Protection Authority.
Answer access requests in full and retain records of mandates – this also applies to data recorded by a service provider.
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic DPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. d, Art. 12 Abs. 3, Art. 15, Art. 28 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Energy and utilities
- Επιβολή προστίμου σε πάροχο ηλεκτρικής ενέργειας και σε τράπεζα για παραβάσεις του ΓΚΠΔ (Απόφαση 8/2026) Decision of an authority
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων – Απόφαση 8/2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link