Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

7cases from 1 jurisdiction
€1.2bnTotal of monetary amounts
€1.19bnLargest single case: Google LLC
€1.16mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20240—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20251€582,573
Q2 20251€304,793
Q3 20252€2.47m
Q4 20252€1.19bn
Q1 20261€2.31m
Q2 20260—
Q3 20260—

7 cases

11 Feb 2026 Disney DTC, LLC und ABC Enterprises, Inc. (The Walt Disney Company)California: $2.75 million against Disney over incomplete opt-outs for streaming USA, CACookies and tracking €2.31m

Disney implemented objections to the sale and sharing of data only for individual services or devices rather than across the whole account, continued to disclose data via embedded ad-tech providers and offered no opt-out in connected TV apps. It was the largest CCPA settlement at the time of the agreement with the Attorney General of California.

What organisations can take from it

An opt-out must take effect across all services, devices and integrated third-party providers of an account.

Authority / court
Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice)
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
11 Feb 2026

Original amount 2,750,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 Dec 2025 Rickenbacher Data LLC (Datamasters)CPPA: $45,000 against data broker Datamasters over failure to register USA, CAMarketing and consent €38,275

Without registering as a data broker, the Texas reseller traded in the names and contact details of millions of people, sorted by illnesses such as Alzheimer's or addiction, by age, presumed ethnicity and political views. In addition to the fine, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) requires it to stop selling data on all Californians.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that buy or sell address lists for advertising must check registration obligations – health-related lists are particularly risky.

Authority / court
California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
California Delete Act (Registrierungspflicht für Datenhändler)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Other
Published
8 Jan 2026

Original amount 45,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

31 Oct 2025 Google LLCTexas: Google pays $1.375 billion over location, incognito and biometric data USA, TXCookies and tracking €1.19bn

Texas, represented by the Office of the Attorney General, had sued Google for unlawfully collecting location data, activity in incognito mode and biometric identifiers. Google signed a settlement of $1.375 billion, concluding two sets of proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Settings such as location history or incognito mode must deliver what they promise users – otherwise billion-dollar risks loom, even at the level of individual US states.

Authority / court
Office of the Attorney General of Texas
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Telecoms, IT and software
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
31 Oct 2025

Original amount 1,375,000,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 31 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

26 Sep 2025 Tractor Supply CompanyCPPA: $1.35 million against Tractor Supply over missing opt-out mechanisms USA, CAData subject rights and transparency €1.16m

The rural retail giant inadequately informed consumers and job applicants about their rights, offered no effective means of opting out of the sale and sharing of data (including no Global Privacy Control) and passed data on to third parties without the required contracts. An officer must certify compliance annually for four years, as required by the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA).

What organisations can take from it

Privacy notices must also cover job applicants, and browser opt-out signals such as GPC must be implemented technically.

Authority / court
California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
30 Sep 2025

Original amount 1,350,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

1 Jul 2025 Healthline Media LLCCalifornia: $1.55 million against Healthline over disclosure of illness-related article titles USA, CACookies and tracking €1.31m

Despite objections, the health portal continued to pass data to advertising partners and transmitted article titles suggestive of diagnoses for targeted advertising; the consent banner did not stop the tracking. In addition, the required contractual clauses with advertising partners were missing. The settlement was reached with the Attorney General of California.

What organisations can take from it

Test consent banners technically: if rejecting does not actually switch off tracking, that is misleading and unlawful.

Authority / court
Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice)
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Unfair Competition Law
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Media and online platforms
Published
1 Jul 2025

Original amount 1,550,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

6 May 2025 Todd Snyder, Inc.Todd Snyder: 345,178 USD – tracking opt-out ineffective for 40 days USA, CACookies and tracking €304,793

For 40 days, the fashion retailer’s misconfigured privacy portal did not process objections to the sale and sharing of personal data; in addition, the company required too much data and identity verification before an opt-out. The California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) imposed 345,178 USD and required correct configuration of consent management and employee training.

What organisations can take from it

A consent management platform does not relieve companies of responsibility: check regularly whether opt-outs are actually implemented technically.

Relevance to training and awareness

Configuration and monitoring of consent management platforms

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA), Board
Area of law
Data protection · Cookies and tracking
Legal basis
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Retail and e-commerce

Original amount 345,178 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

7 Mar 2025 American Honda Motor Co., Inc.CPPA: $632,500 against Honda over obstructed privacy requests USA, CAData subject rights and transparency €582,573

Honda required excessive information for opt-out requests, used a cookie tool without equivalent choices, made it harder to appoint authorised agents and passed data on to ad-tech firms without the required contracts. The order of the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) requires, among other things, a simplified procedure and training for employees.

What organisations can take from it

Do not undermine data subject rights through form hurdles or asymmetric consent dialogues.

Authority / court
California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Automotive
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
12 Mar 2025

Original amount 632,500 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 Mar 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial