Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

2cases from 2 jurisdictions
€1,948Total of monetary amounts (1 case with an amount)
€1,948Largest single case: SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.
€1,948Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

Where?

by region

All jurisdictions

  1. EU €1,948 100 % · 2 cases

What for?

by action
  1. Fine €1,948 100 % · 1 case
  2. Order — 0 % · 1 case

Who?

by company
  1. SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L. €1,948 100 % · 1 case
  2. AS Wasa — 0 % · 1 case

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20230—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20240—
Q3 20241—
Q4 20240—
Q1 20250—
Q2 20250—
Q3 20250—
Q4 20250—
Q1 20260—
Q2 20261€1,948
Q3 20260—

2 cases

15 Jun 2026 SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.Stranger in Kaufland CCTV room – service provider SSG Select Solutions pays 2,000 EUR RomaniaVideo surveillance €1,948

An employee of the service provider acting as processor for Kaufland România let a third party into a store’s video surveillance room; that person filmed the images and distributed them on social media. Kaufland reported the incident. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed 10,200 lei (2,000 EUR) on the processor and ordered additional checks of the work instructions; the fine has been paid. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in April 2026.

What organisations can take from it

Anyone with access to surveillance rooms must know: video footage is confidential, and third parties have no access there.

Relevance to training and awareness

Access to surveillance rooms; staff bound by instructions

Authority / court
Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 29, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b, Abs. 2 und 4 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other
Published
15 Jun 2026

Original amount 10,200 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

30 Sep 2024 AS WasaWellness hotel Wasa must suspend video surveillance in treatment area EstoniaVideo surveillance Order

Following a tip-off that at the Wasa Resort Spa filming was also taking place in the treatment area and for monitoring work discipline, and that cameras captured the neighbouring property, the Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, AKI) ordered the hotel to suspend video surveillance until a sound balancing of interests had been submitted, to stop recording the neighbouring property and to correct the camera information on the website. The hotel had repeatedly let the supervisory authority’s deadlines lapse.

What organisations can take from it

Cameras require a documented balancing of interests for each location – performance monitoring of employees is not a permissible purpose.

Relevance to training and awareness

Video surveillance of employees and guests

Authority / court
Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (AKI)
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
§ 56 Abs. 1, § 58 Abs. 1 IKS; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d und f, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
Action
Order
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Other

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial