Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 756 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by topic- Data breaches and data security €16.2m 55 % · 4 cases
- Marketing and consent €13.2m 45 % · 4 cases
- Employee data €71,474 0 % · 1 case
- Data subject rights and transparency €67,629 0 % · 5 cases
- International data transfers €4,000 0 % · 1 case
- Video surveillance €1,948 0 % · 2 cases
- Cookies and tracking — 0 % · 1 case
- no topic — 0 % · 1 case
Who?
by company- Capita plc und Capita Pension Solutions Limited €16.1m 55 % · 1 case
- Ö Aktiengesellschaft (in der Entscheidung abgekürzt; Adressverlag und Direktwerbeunternehmen) €13m 44 % · 1 case
- ONE WAY PRIVATE COMPANY €80,000 0 % · 1 case
- Arbeitgeber (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt) €71,474 0 % · 1 case
- DPP Law Ltd €69,458 0 % · 1 case
- AMATO BESTSELLER S.R.L. €54,316 0 % · 1 case
- Rickenbacher Data LLC (Datamasters) €38,275 0 % · 1 case
- D*** GmbH (Digitalmarketing- und Recruitingagentur, anonymisiert) €25,500 0 % · 1 case
- Sport & Spa Gest, S.L. €17,600 0 % · 1 case
- Untold SRL €14,998 0 % · 1 case
- 9 more€23,482
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q3 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2023 | 0 | — |
| Q1 2024 | 1 | €5,005 |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | — |
| Q3 2024 | 1 | — |
| Q4 2024 | 3 | €18,998 |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q2 2025 | 1 | €69,458 |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | — |
| Q4 2025 | 5 | €16.2m |
| Q1 2026 | 3 | €35,031 |
| Q2 2026 | 3 | €13.1m |
| Q3 2026 | 2 | €57,314 |
19 cases
19 Aug 2026 Poliserv JG (PJG) SRLPhishing on admin account – Poliserv JG must pay 3,000 EUR €2,998
Attackers obtained the credentials of a user account with administrator rights through phishing and accessed customer data. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) criticised the lack of technical and organisational measures and of regular effectiveness testing, imposed 15,728 lei (3,000 EUR) and ordered regular employee training, including on recognising phishing e-mails. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Admin accounts need MFA, and all employees must be able to recognise phishing – the supervisory authority now expressly orders training.
Phishing recognition, protection of privileged accounts
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und Abs. 2 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 19 Aug 2026
Original amount 15,728 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Aug 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 19.08.2026 (Poliserv JG (PJG) SRL) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
6 Aug 2026 AMATO BESTSELLER S.R.L.AMATO BESTSELLER: 45,000 EUR plus 50,000 lei for data access and robocalls €54,316
Following several complaints, the Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (Romanian data protection authority, ANSPDCP) found that current and former employees, untrained and without procedural rules, had access to extensive data (including health, family and income data), that data subjects were not informed under Art. 14 GDPR, that excessive data were collected and that automated advertising calls were made without consent. Fines: 78,465 lei (15,000 EUR, Art. 32(4)), 52,310 lei (10,000 EUR, Art. 14), 104,620 lei (20,000 EUR, Art. 5/9 GDPR) and 50,000 lei (Law 506/2004); in addition, an order to provide regular employee training. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in June 2026.
Anyone giving employees access to sensitive customer data must train them and limit access on a need-to-know basis.
Training employees in handling customer data; consent for advertising calls
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. c i. V. m. Art. 9, Art. 14, Art. 32 Abs. 4 DSGVO; Art. 12 Abs. 1 Gesetz 506/2004
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 6 Aug 2026
Original amount 285,395 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 6 Aug 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 06.08.2026 (AMATO BESTSELLER S.R.L.) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Jun 2026 Ö Aktiengesellschaft (in der Entscheidung abgekürzt; Adressverlag und Direktwerbeunternehmen)VwGH sets data protection fine for party affinities definitively at 13 million EUR €13m
The company had stored statistically calculated ‘party affinities’ for around 2.2 million people and in some cases sold them to advertising clients – special categories of personal data without consent; in addition, parcel frequency data was further processed for incompatible purposes. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) had imposed 18 million EUR in 2019 and the Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht, BVwG) 16 million EUR in 2024; Austria's Supreme Administrative Court (Verwaltungsgerichtshof, VwGH) has now set the fine with final effect at 13 million EUR (plus 100,000 EUR in procedural costs).
Calculated characteristics such as political leanings are themselves special categories – companies that derive them for advertising need explicit consent.
- Authority / court
- Verwaltungsgerichtshof (Ausgangsbescheid: Datenschutzbehörde)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und b, Art. 6 Abs. 4, Art. 9 Abs. 1 (VwGH Ro 2025/04/0007)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- reduced
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- Comprehensive cooperation, deletion of the party affinities, settlements with data subjects, long duration of proceedings (5 years, 10 months).
- Published
- 16 Jul 2026
- VwGH 24.06.2026, Ro 2025/04/0007 Court decision
- VwGH bestätigt unrechtmäßige Verarbeitung von Partei-Affinitäten und setzt Geldbuße mit EUR 13 Mio. fest Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Jun 2026 SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.Stranger in Kaufland CCTV room – service provider SSG Select Solutions pays 2,000 EUR €1,948
An employee of the service provider acting as processor for Kaufland România let a third party into a store’s video surveillance room; that person filmed the images and distributed them on social media. Kaufland reported the incident. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed 10,200 lei (2,000 EUR) on the processor and ordered additional checks of the work instructions; the fine has been paid. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in April 2026.
Anyone with access to surveillance rooms must know: video footage is confidential, and third parties have no access there.
Access to surveillance rooms; staff bound by instructions
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- Art. 29, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b, Abs. 2 und 4 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 15 Jun 2026
Original amount 10,200 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Jun 2026.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 15.06.2026 (SSG SELECT SOLUTIONS S.R.L.) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
9 Apr 2026 Arbeitgeber (in der Mitteilung nicht namentlich genannt)Slovenia: 71,474 EUR for covert monitoring of employees using spyware €71,474
An employer installed the software Spyrix Employee Monitoring on the work computers of individual employees, which for months recorded screen content, audio and even private e-mails and conversations without informing the employees. The supervisory authority, the Informacijski pooblaščenec (Information Commissioner of the Republic of Slovenia, IP), imposed 71,474 EUR on the company and 4,000 EUR on the responsible person.
Covert employee monitoring by software is practically never permissible – IT and managers must know this before tools are installed.
Permissible monitoring of employees and IT use
- Authority / court
- Informacijski pooblaščenec Republike Slovenije (IP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Employee data
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 und Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- intentional
- Liability of senior managers
- Additional fine of 4,000 EUR on the responsible person.
- Published
- 9 Apr 2026
- Delodajalcu, ki je prikrito nadzoroval vse aktivnosti zaposlenih na računalnikih, izrečena globa več kot 70.000 EUR Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
24 Mar 2026 SIA "Fitsypro"Fitsypro fails to answer access request and DVI enquiries – 1,500 EUR €1,500
A person complained that Fitsypro had not responded to their request for access, rectification and erasure of November 2023. Three requests for information from the Datu valsts inspekcija (Latvian Data State Inspectorate, DVI) between 2024 and 2026 went unanswered, and nobody attended the hearing. The DVI imposed 1,500 EUR and requested the information by 21 April 2026.
Official mailboxes (eAdrese) and data protection e-mail addresses must be monitored – silence towards the supervisory authority costs money.
Handling data subject requests and correspondence from authorities
- Authority / court
- Datu valsts inspekcija (DVI)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 58 Abs. 1 lit. e, Art. 83 Abs. 5 lit. e DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- intentional
- DVI Lēmums Par soda piemērošanu (SIA „Fitsypro“), 24.03.2026 Decision of an authority
- Datu valsts inspekcija – Lēmumi (Liste der veröffentlichten Entscheidungen) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
2 Mar 2026 Nordic Cleaning ApSNordic Cleaning: fine for leaving access request unanswered despite an order €8,031
Despite repeated follow-ups by the trade union, the cleaning company did not respond to a union member’s access request and also failed to comply with the order of the Danish Data Protection Agency (Datatilsynet) to decide on the request. Datatilsynet reported the company; the case was closed on 2 March 2026 with a fine notice of 60,000 DKK.
Access requests and orders from authorities need a fixed intake channel and a responsible person – ignoring them leads straight to a criminal complaint.
Handling access requests (Art. 15 GDPR)
- Authority / court
- Anklagemyndigheden (Bødeforelæg) auf Anzeige der Datatilsynet
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 15; Nichtbefolgung einer Anordnung der Datatilsynet; databeskyttelsesloven
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
Original amount 60,000 DKK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 2 Mar 2026.
- Datatilsynet – Klein2 ApS og Nordic Cleaning ApS indstilles til bøde (Opdatering: afgjort 2. marts 2026) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
19 Jan 2026 D*** GmbH (Digitalmarketing- und Recruitingagentur, anonymisiert)Recruitment agency: 25,500 EUR for secretly recorded calls with applicants €25,500
The agency conducted telephone pre-screening interviews with applicants on behalf of client companies, recorded them without valid consent, stored them indefinitely and presented itself as the client company in doing so. The Austrian Data Protection Authority (Datenschutzbehörde, DSB) imposed 25,500 EUR (plus 2,550 EUR in costs) for lack of a legal basis and transparency; the company has lodged an appeal against the amount of the fine with the Federal Administrative Court (Bundesverwaltungsgericht).
Call recordings in recruitment need a genuine legal basis and clear information about who is actually responsible.
Recording of telephone calls and applicant data
- Authority / court
- Datenschutzbehörde
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, c und e, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 12, 13
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- under appeal
- Sector
- Other
- Employees
- Under 50
- Mitigating circumstances
- No relevant previous violations, cooperation in the proceedings; adjustment of the starting amount to the company's small size.
- Datenschutzbehörde, Straferkenntnis 2025-1.049.138 vom 19.01.2026 Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
31 Dec 2025 ONE WAY PRIVATE COMPANYGreece: 80,000 EUR against call centre One Way over marketing calls for gas supplier €80,000
Following numerous complaints about marketing calls for the gas supplier ZENITH, the Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) found that the call centre engaged had insufficient security measures and called persons without valid consent. By Decision 44/2025, One Way received 40,000 EUR each as processor and as controller, together with an order to delete the data of persons without valid consent; ZENITH and two other service providers were also held liable (10,000, 10,000 and 5,000 EUR).
Anyone outsourcing telemarketing must regularly carry out sample checks on call centres – and call centres are themselves liable for calls made without consent.
Checking consent before telemarketing
- Authority / court
- Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- Art. 5, 6, 7, 29, 32 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Repeat case
- yes
- Απόφαση 44/2025 της Αρχής Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Dec 2025 Rickenbacher Data LLC (Datamasters)CPPA: $45,000 against data broker Datamasters over failure to register €38,275
Without registering as a data broker, the Texas reseller traded in the names and contact details of millions of people, sorted by illnesses such as Alzheimer's or addiction, by age, presumed ethnicity and political views. In addition to the fine, the California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA) requires it to stop selling data on all Californians.
Companies that buy or sell address lists for advertising must check registration obligations – health-related lists are particularly risky.
- Authority / court
- California Privacy Protection Agency (CPPA)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Marketing and consent
- Legal basis
- California Delete Act (Registrierungspflicht für Datenhändler)
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 8 Jan 2026
Original amount 45,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Dec 2025.
- CalPrivacy Data Broker Enforcement Strike Force: enforcement actions Press release of an authority
- CPPA Order of Decision: Rickenbacher Data LLC d/b/a Datamasters (ENF25-172-D-DA) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
15 Oct 2025 Capita plc und Capita Pension Solutions LimitedICO: £14 million against Capita after ransomware attack affecting 6.6 million people €16.1m
In March 2023, an employee unintentionally downloaded malicious files; although an alert was triggered after ten minutes, the device was only isolated after 58 hours. Attackers stole around one terabyte of data on 6.6 million people (including pension data and criminal record information). Fines imposed by the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO): £8 million against Capita plc and £6 million against Capita Pension Solutions.
Security alerts need binding response times and an adequately staffed SOC – known vulnerabilities must be remedied across the group.
Handling malicious downloads and security alerts
- Authority / court
- Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- UK GDPR Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Other
- Employees
- 10,000 or more
- Culpability
- negligent
- Mitigating circumstances
- £45 million had provisionally been proposed; reduced, among other things, for security improvements, credit monitoring for those affected and cooperation with authorities and the NCSC.
- Published
- 15 Oct 2025
Original amount 14,000,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 15 Oct 2025.
- Capita fined £14m for data breach affecting over 6m people Press release of an authority
- ICO Enforcement: Capita plc Enforcement database of an authority
- ICO Monetary Penalty Notice: Capita plc and Capita Pension Solutions Limited Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
13 Oct 2025 Sport & Spa Gest, S.L.AEPD: 17,600 EUR against sports centre over location tags for swimmers €17,600
The operator of a sports facility rented a Bluetooth system with which swimmers were located in the pool via tags and their training was recorded. The Spanish data protection authority (Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, AEPD) imposed 8,000 EUR for the processing of special categories of data and – after a 20% reduction for immediate payment – 4,000, 2,400 and 3,200 EUR for lack of a legal basis, insufficient information and a deficient impact assessment (17,600 EUR in total); the request for reconsideration was unsuccessful.
New tracking or sensor technology in customer-facing operations requires a legal basis, information and a genuine impact assessment in advance.
- Authority / court
- Agencia Española de Protección de Datos (AEPD)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Mitigating circumstances
- Partial immediate payment (20% reduction under Art. 85 LPACAP).
- AEPD Resolución PS/00160/2024 (EXP202308414) Decision of an authority
- AEPD Resolución recurso de reposición PS/00160/2024 (Datum der Ausgangsentscheidung 13.10.2025) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
6 Oct 2025 Zu Disain OÜZu Disain must delete personal data collected from the land register by script Order
The company had used an automated script to carry out mass queries in the electronic land register and stored data of natural persons without demonstrating a legal basis; it did not respond to requests from the supervisory authority. The Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, AKI) ordered erasure with proof or a statement of a legal basis with a balancing of interests; a penalty payment of 2,000 EUR was threatened.
Publicly accessible register data remain personal data – automated scraping requires its own legal basis.
Public registers are no licence for data collection
- Authority / court
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (AKI)
- Area of law
- Data protection
- Legal basis
- § 56 Abs. 1 IKS; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d, Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Ettekirjutus-hoiatus nr 2.1.-4/25/1239-2660-6 (Zu Disain OÜ), 06.10.2025 Decision of an authority
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon – veröffentlichte Ettekirjutused (Liste) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
14 Apr 2025 DPP Law LtdICO: £60,000 against law firm DPP Law over hack and late notification €69,458
In 2022, attackers used brute force to penetrate the law firm's network via a rarely used administrator account without MFA and stole 32 GB of highly sensitive data, which appeared on the dark web. The firm only learned of this from the National Crime Agency and reported the incident to the UK Information Commissioner's Office (ICO) only 43 days later.
Even small law firms need MFA on admin accounts and a reporting process that meets the 72-hour deadline.
- Authority / court
- Information Commissioner's Office (ICO)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- UK GDPR Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 33 Abs. 1
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Culpability
- negligent
- Published
- 16 Apr 2025
Original amount 60,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 14 Apr 2025.
- Law firm fined £60,000 following cyber attack Press release of an authority
- ICO Enforcement: DPP Law Ltd Enforcement database of an authority
- ICO Monetary Penalty Notice: DPP Law Ltd Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
16 Dec 2024 Aktiebolaget Trav och GaloppATG: reprimand over misleadingly designed cookie banner Reprimand or warning
Following a complaint – one of several complaints about cookie banners lodged with European data protection authorities – the Swedish Authority for Privacy Protection (IMY) found that the betting operator did not make withdrawing consent as easy as giving it and, through the misleading design of the banner (choice of colours, contrast, rejection only as a link), made informed, freely given consent more difficult. IMY issued a reprimand; ATG had since changed the banner.
Rejecting must be as easy as accepting: colour, contrast and link placement in the cookie banner must not steer the decision.
- Authority / court
- Integritetsskyddsmyndigheten (IMY)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Cookies and tracking
- Legal basis
- DSGVO Art. 6, Art. 7 Abs. 3
- Action
- Reprimand or warning
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- IMY – Tillsyn Aktiebolaget Trav och Galopp Decision of an authority
- IMY – Beslut efter tillsyn, IMY-2023-16453 (16.12.2024) Decision of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
26 Nov 2024 CMC Certus Management Consultants LtdCyprus: 4,000 EUR against visa service provider CMC Certus – client documents on Scribd €4,000
Without informing them, the residence permit consultancy sent a client couple’s marriage certificate and proof of salary to a sister company in Georgia for translation; the documents subsequently appeared publicly on the Scribd platform. The Επίτροπος Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Commissioner for Personal Data Protection) imposed 2,000 EUR each for an impermissible transfer to a third country and for lack of security measures, as well as a reprimand for insufficient cooperation.
Translation by a group company in a third country is also a data transfer – requiring safeguards, information and confidentiality rules.
Passing client documents on to translators and group companies
- Authority / court
- Επίτροπος Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Commissioner for Personal Data Protection)
- Area of law
- Data protection · International data transfers
- Legal basis
- Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 31, Art. 44 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Decision – Complaint against CMC Certus Management Consultants Ltd (26.11.2024) Decision of an authority
- 28/03/2025 Αποφάσεις: Οκτώβριος – Δεκέμβριος 2024 Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Oct 2024 Untold SRLUntold SRL fails to answer access and erasure request – 15,000 EUR €14,998
Untold SRL left an access request and an erasure request from a data subject unanswered, even though the data subject had provided all contact details. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed 49,741 lei (10,000 EUR) in respect of access and 24,870.5 lei (5,000 EUR) in respect of erasure and ordered staff training. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Data subject requests need a ticketing system with the one-month deadline – seasonal event organisers included.
Timely handling of data subject requests
Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- Art. 12 Abs. 3 und 4, Art. 15, Art. 17 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 30 Oct 2024
Original amount 74,611.5 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 30 Oct 2024.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 30.10.2024 (Untold SRL) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
30 Sep 2024 AS WasaWellness hotel Wasa must suspend video surveillance in treatment area Order
Following a tip-off that at the Wasa Resort Spa filming was also taking place in the treatment area and for monitoring work discipline, and that cameras captured the neighbouring property, the Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (Estonian Data Protection Inspectorate, AKI) ordered the hotel to suspend video surveillance until a sound balancing of interests had been submitted, to stop recording the neighbouring property and to correct the camera information on the website. The hotel had repeatedly let the supervisory authority’s deadlines lapse.
Cameras require a documented balancing of interests for each location – performance monitoring of employees is not a permissible purpose.
Video surveillance of employees and guests
- Authority / court
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon (AKI)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Video surveillance
- Legal basis
- § 56 Abs. 1, § 58 Abs. 1 IKS; Art. 58 Abs. 2 lit. d und f, Art. 5 Abs. 1, Art. 6 Abs. 1 DSGVO
- Action
- Order
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Ettekirjutus-hoiatus nr 2.1.-1/23/124-377-13 (AS Wasa), 30.09.2024 Decision of an authority
- Andmekaitse Inspektsioon – veröffentlichte Ettekirjutused (Liste) Official register or notice
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link
Report an error
5 Mar 2024 EURO MINI STORAGE ROMANIA SRLEuro Mini Storage paralysed for weeks after cyber attack – 5,000 EUR €5,005
A cyber attack on the server paralysed the company for several weeks and allowed access to customer data. The Romanian data protection authority (ANSPDCP) imposed 24,884.50 lei (5,000 EUR) for insufficient security measures and ordered access logging with a retention period of at least 30 days as well as backups. Date = publication of the press release; according to the authority, the investigation was concluded in the previous month.
Logging and tested backups determine whether an attack means days or weeks of downtime.
- Authority / court
- Autoritatea Națională de Supraveghere a Prelucrării Datelor cu Caracter Personal (ANSPDCP)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data breaches and data security
- Legal basis
- Art. 24 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und d, Abs. 2 DSGVO
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- unknown
- Sector
- Other
- Published
- 5 Mar 2024
Original amount 24,884.5 RON, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Mar 2024.
- ANSPDCP – Comunicat de presă 05.03.2024 (EURO MINI STORAGE ROMANIA SRL) Press release of an authority
Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link