Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe and North America: 718 cases from 32 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

13cases from 8 jurisdictions
€6.45mTotal of monetary amounts (10 cases with an amount)
€5mLargest single case: France Travail
€20,902Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q3 20230—
Q4 20231—
Q1 20240—
Q2 20241€26,803
Q3 20240—
Q4 20242€9,000
Q1 20251€9,000
Q2 20251€550,000
Q3 20251—
Q4 20252€190,000
Q1 20262€5.01m
Q2 20260—
Q3 20262€653,000

13 cases

3 Sep 2026 ASIS – Azienda Speciale per la gestione degli Impianti Sportivi (Trento)Garante: 8,000 EUR for cameras in swimming pool changing rooms of a Trentino sports operator ItalyVideo surveillance €8,000

Since 2007, the municipal sports facilities operator had had cameras in the changing rooms of a swimming pool that recorded the locker area. The Italian data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) found no sound legal basis, incomplete notices and a 72-hour retention period not justified by a necessity assessment, and imposed 8,000 EUR (Provvedimento No. 619); the cameras were removed during the proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Changing rooms and comparably intimate areas are off limits for video surveillance – even when theft prevention is the motive.

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a, Art. 6 Abs. 1 lit. c und e DSGVO; Art. 2-ter Codice privacy
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
11 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

25 Aug 2026 Health Service Executive (HSE)Irish health service HSE: 645,000 EUR for neglected paper patient records IrelandData breaches and data security €645,000

In 2023, intruders gained access to two former psychiatric hospitals and posted videos of the patient records stored there online. An inspection of twelve sites found records with mould, water and animal damage in unsuitable rooms, up to and including shipping containers. Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) imposed a fine of 645,000 EUR, issued a reprimand and ordered audits and the relocation of records.

What organisations can take from it

Data protection also applies to paper archives in disused buildings – retention requires an inventory, erasure periods and physical security.

Relevance to training and awareness

Physical security and retention of paper records

Authority / court
Data Protection Commission (DPC)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. e und f, 32 Abs. 1, 33 Abs. 1, 34 Abs. 1
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
2 Sep 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

22 Jan 2026 France TravailCNIL: 5 million EUR against France Travail after social engineering attack FranceData breaches and data security €5m

In early 2024, attackers used social engineering to take over accounts of Cap Emploi advisers and accessed data on jobseekers from the last 20 years, including social security numbers. The French data protection authority (CNIL) criticised weak authentication, insufficient logging and overly broad access rights, and imposed 5 million EUR together with an order carrying a penalty payment of 5,000 EUR per day of delay.

What organisations can take from it

Accounts of external partners with extensive data access need strong authentication, narrow rights and anomaly detection – and their users need training against social engineering.

Relevance to training and awareness

Social engineering and account takeover

Authority / court
Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés (CNIL)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 32 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Employees
10,000 or more
Published
29 Jan 2026

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

8 Jan 2026 Αρχηγείο Πυροσβεστικού Σώματος (Hauptquartier der griechischen Feuerwehr)Greece: 10,000 EUR against Fire Service Headquarters over health data in duty log GreeceEmployee data €10,000

In a daily orders book of a fire service unit that was accessible to staff, not only the transfer of a female officer to light duties was recorded, but also her illness, the treatment and the medication prescribed. The Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority) found a breach of lawfulness and data minimisation and, by Decision 1/2026, imposed a fine of 10,000 EUR on the Fire Service Headquarters.

What organisations can take from it

Employees’ health information never belongs in generally accessible official records – the reason for an absence generally does not need to be disclosed.

Relevance to training and awareness

Confidential handling of employees’ health data

Authority / court
Αρχή Προστασίας Δεδομένων Προσωπικού Χαρακτήρα (Hellenic Data Protection Authority)
Area of law
Data protection · Employee data
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und c DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

15 Dec 2025 Stichting Hogeschool van Arnhem en Nijmegen (HAN University of Applied Sciences)Netherlands: 175,000 EUR against HAN university over inadequate security after hack NetherlandsData breaches and data security €175,000

In 2021, a hacker gained access via a web form to a web server and a database server of the university, obtained, among other things, names with passwords and citizen service numbers of students and staff, and unsuccessfully demanded a ransom. According to the Dutch data protection authority (Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens, AP), security was not aligned with the risks, and the rights of a database account were not restricted.

What organisations can take from it

Give database accounts of web applications minimal rights so that a single vulnerability does not expose the entire data set.

Authority / court
Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 32
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement without objection; active damage limitation, strengthened resilience and sharing of lessons learned with other organisations.
Published
17 Dec 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

23 Oct 2025 Comune di CurtaroloMunicipality of Curtarolo: 15,000 EUR for video surveillance of streets and employees ItalyVideo surveillance €15,000

The municipality in the province of Padua monitored public streets and work areas without a sound legal basis, without adequate information and without a data protection impact assessment; recordings were used for disciplinary purposes, and an employee was secretly filmed while on sick leave. Italy's data protection authority (Garante per la protezione dei dati personali) imposed a fine of 15,000 EUR (5,000 EUR for public surveillance, 10,000 EUR for workplace surveillance).

What organisations can take from it

Do not repurpose video recordings for disciplinary proceedings; specific employment law protections apply to employees.

Relevance to training and awareness

Purpose limitation in video surveillance and employee data

Authority / court
Garante per la protezione dei dati personali
Area of law
Data protection · Video surveillance
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5, 6, 12, 13, 35, 88
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector
Sources

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

4 Sep 2025 Einheitlicher Abwicklungsausschuss (Single Resolution Board, SRB)CJEU: pseudonymised data in disclosure to Deloitte – EDPS v SRB EU levelData subject rights and transparency —

The Single Resolution Board (SRB) passed on pseudonymised comments from former Banco Popular shareholders to Deloitte without informing the data subjects; the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS) considered this an infringement of the duty to inform. The Court of Justice of the European Union (Case C-413/23 P) set aside the judgment of the General Court and clarified that the duty to inform is to be assessed from the controller's perspective at the time of collection; the case was referred back to the General Court.

What organisations can take from it

Pseudonymisation does not release the controller from informing data subjects about the recipients of their data.

Authority / court
Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union, Rs. C-413/23 P
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Verordnung (EU) 2018/1725 (Informationspflicht)
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Public sector
Published
4 Sep 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

12 Jun 2025 Department of Social Protection (DSP)DPC: 550,000 EUR against Irish social protection ministry over facial matching without legal basis IrelandData subject rights and transparency €550,000

For registration for the Public Services Card, the ministry created biometric facial templates of a large part of the population without a sufficiently clear legal basis, with deficient information and an incomplete data protection impact assessment. Ireland's Data Protection Commission (DPC) issued a reprimand, imposed 550,000 EUR and ordered the biometric processing to be stopped within nine months if no valid legal basis is found.

What organisations can take from it

Biometric procedures require a precise statutory basis and a complete impact assessment before they are rolled out widely.

Authority / court
Data Protection Commission (DPC)
Area of law
Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. a und e, Art. 6 Abs. 1, Art. 9 Abs. 1, Art. 13, Art. 35 Abs. 7 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Mitigating circumstances
No deficiencies were found in the technical and organisational security measures.
Published
12 Jun 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

21 Jan 2025 Užimtumo tarnyba prie Lietuvos Respublikos socialinės apsaugos ir darbo ministerijosEmployment service sends Excel file with data of 29,636 clients – 9,000 EUR LithuaniaData breaches and data security €9,000

An employee accidentally attached an Excel file containing data of 29,636 clients, including health data, to an e-mail sent to 292 clients. The Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate, VDAI) found that measures to prevent data leakage had not been sufficiently tested and that the employee had not been involved in data classification and had been insufficiently instructed; fine of 9,000 EUR. Date = publication; source: archived copy.

What organisations can take from it

One wrong attachment is enough for a mass data breach – DLP tools only help if all employees are trained and involved.

Relevance to training and awareness

Checking e-mail attachments, data classification

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (VDAI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 24 Abs. 1, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b und d DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
21 Jan 2025

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 Nov 2024 Lyngby-Taarbæk KommuneLyngby-Taarbæk: police report with proposed fine over missing MFA and legacy accounts DenmarkData breaches and data security Other

At least 1,000 former employees retained access after leaving to the KMD Nexus specialist system containing data on around 30,000 citizens; one former employee viewed 1,022 citizen records. In addition, an unauthorised person used an employee's login credentials for Office services containing information on around 5,000 people – both systems had been accessible from the internet for years without multi-factor authentication. The Danish data protection authority (Datatilsynet) reported the municipality to the police and proposed a fine of 350,000 to 400,000 DKK; the case is still pending before the courts, and no fine has been imposed so far.

What organisations can take from it

Revoke access immediately when employees leave, and protect remote access with multi-factor authentication.

Relevance to training and awareness

Offboarding, access rights and multi-factor authentication

Authority / court
Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
27 Nov 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

18 Oct 2024 Vilniaus rajono savivaldybės administracijaRansomware attack on Vilnius district administration – data protection fine of 9,000 EUR LithuaniaData breaches and data security €9,000

Following a break-in into the district administration’s servers in which data were encrypted, services failed and social benefits were delayed. The Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (Lithuanian State Data Protection Inspectorate, VDAI) found insufficient malware protection, deficient management of rights and passwords, a lack of recovery and insufficient information of data subjects and imposed 9,000 EUR. Date = publication; source: archived copy.

What organisations can take from it

Backups, patch management and password rules are a data protection duty for public authorities too – and data subjects must receive specific advice on protecting themselves.

Relevance to training and awareness

Password security, ransomware preparedness

Authority / court
Valstybinė duomenų apsaugos inspekcija (VDAI)
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
Art. 5 Abs. 1 lit. f, Art. 32 Abs. 1 lit. b, c und d, Art. 34 Abs. 2 DSGVO
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
18 Oct 2024

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

27 May 2024 Hvidovre KommuneHvidovre Kommune: 200,000 DKK after disclosing protected addresses of children to parents DenmarkData breaches and data security €26,803

Following a system change, both parents with custody gained access to letters from the municipal dental care service and automatically received letters containing, in some cases, protected addresses of the children – without any check as to whether the disclosure was permissible. The Danish Data Protection Agency (Datatilsynet) criticised the lack of change management; the municipality accepted a fine notice of 200,000 DKK.

What organisations can take from it

Whenever access rights or automated mailing processes are changed, check in advance who will see which data afterwards.

Relevance to training and awareness

Change management for IT systems holding sensitive data

Authority / court
Anklagemyndigheden (Bødeforelæg) auf Anzeige der Datatilsynet
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 32
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Public sector

Original amount 200,000 DKK, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 May 2024.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

14 Dec 2023 Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite (NAP, bulgarische Steuerbehörde)CJEU: after hacker attack, Bulgaria's tax authority must prove adequate security EU levelData breaches and data security —

Following a cyber attack in 2019, data on millions of people from the IT system of the Bulgarian tax authority (Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, NAP) was published on the internet. The Court of Justice of the European Union (Case C-340/21) ruled that the controller must prove the adequacy of its protective measures, can be liable even for attacks by third parties, and that the mere fear of misuse of data can constitute non-material damage.

What organisations can take from it

After an attack, the company bears the burden of proving adequate security – documenting the measures protects against liability.

Authority / court
Gerichtshof der Europäischen Union, Rs. C-340/21
Area of law
Data protection · Data breaches and data security
Legal basis
DSGVO Art. 24, Art. 32, Art. 82
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Public sector
Published
14 Dec 2023

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text — no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that sticks?

Try it free for 14 days — from 1 user, no credit card, ends automatically.

Start free trial