Compliance Radar
Who was sanctioned, and for what?
Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific and Middle East: 1,929 cases from 40 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.
Click a bar to drill down one level.
Where?
by regionAll jurisdictions
What for?
by topicWho?
by company- TikTok Technology Limited €530m 33 % · 1 case
- Google LLC und Google Ireland Limited €325m 21 % · 1 case
- LinkedIn Ireland Unlimited Company €310m 20 % · 1 case
- Meta Platforms Ireland Limited €251m 16 % · 1 case
- Anonymised companies €104m 7 % · 7 cases
- ByteDance Brasil Tecnologia Ltda. (TikTok) €25.6m 2 % · 1 case
- Reddit, Inc. €16.6m 1 % · 1 case
- Disney Worldwide Services, Inc. und Disney Entertainment Operations LLC €8.48m 1 % · 1 case
- Netflix International B.V. €4.75m 0 % · 1 case
- Disney DTC, LLC und ABC Enterprises, Inc. (The Walt Disney Company) €2.31m 0 % · 1 case
- 12 more€5.12m
When?
per quarter, by date of decision| Period | Cases | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Q4 2023 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2024 | 0 | – |
| Q1 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2025 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2025 | 1 | €1.22m |
| Q1 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q2 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q3 2026 | 0 | – |
| Q4 2026 | 0 | – |
1 case
21 Nov 2025 Jam City, Inc.Jam City: 1.4 million USD in California over missing opt-outs in 21 gaming apps €1.22m
On a complaint by the California Attorney General, the Superior Court in Los Angeles entered a stipulated judgment against the mobile game developer Jam City. According to the investigation, none of Jam City's 21 apps offered a way, as required by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), to opt out of the sale or sharing of personal data for personalised advertising, and some games passed on data of teenagers aged between 13 and 16 without their affirmative consent. Jam City pays 1,400,000 USD, must offer opt-out options within the apps, may only sell or share data of under-16s on an opt-in basis and must instruct recipients to delete such data. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.
A business that shares data for advertising through apps must enable the opt-out where the data is collected – directly in the app.
Right to opt out of data sales in apps; protecting minors in advertising tracking
- Authority / court
- Superior Court of California, County of Los Angeles, auf Klage des Attorney General of California (California Department of Justice)
- Area of law
- Data protection · Data subject rights and transparency
- Legal basis
- California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.100 ff.; Zahlung nach Cal. Civ. Code § 1798.199.90
- Action
- Fine
- Status of proceedings
- final
- Sector
- Media and online platforms
- Published
- 21 Nov 2025
Original amount 1,400,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 21 Nov 2025.
- People v. Jam City, Inc., Case No. 25STCV34029, Superior Court Los Angeles, Final Judgment and Permanent Injunction (21.11.2025) Court decision
- California DOJ, Pressemitteilung: Attorney General Bonta Secures $1.4 Million Settlement with Mobile App Gaming Company (21.11.2025) Press release of an authority
- California DOJ: Privacy Enforcement Actions (Übersicht) Enforcement database of an authority
Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link