Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,033 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

1case from 1 jurisdiction
€4.12mTotal of monetary amounts
€4.12mLargest single case: Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.
€4.12mMedian per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per quarter, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
Q4 20230–
Q1 20240–
Q2 20240–
Q3 20240–
Q4 20241€4.12m
Q1 20250–
Q2 20250–
Q3 20250–
Q4 20250–
Q1 20260–
Q2 20260–
Q3 20260–
Q4 20260–

1 case

11 Dec 2024 Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance Co., Ltd.Hyundai Marine & Fire: 6.198 billion KRW for manipulative consent pop-up South KoreaMarketing and consent €4.12m

Hyundai Marine & Fire Insurance showed users of its online car insurance premium calculator who had declined consent to product marketing a further pop-up, swapped the effect of its buttons in July 2022 and mentioned neither the processing of data nor the mandatory information in it; the consents obtained in this way were invalid, and other insurers copied the pattern. The authority imposed a penalty surcharge of 6,198,000,000 KRW and ordered lawful consent, deletion of data from abandoned premium calculations and stronger internal controls with independent powers for the chief privacy officer. In the same session eleven further direct insurers were sanctioned, including AXA General Insurance (2,715,000,000 KRW) and Hana Insurance (273,000,000 KRW). The amount and the facts have not been confirmed against the primary source.

What organisations can take from it

A refusal that is turned into consent by a second pop-up is not valid consent – consent flows belong with the data protection officer before launch.

Relevance to training and awareness

Dark patterns in marketing consent

Authority / court
Personal Information Protection Commission (PIPC, 개인정보보호위원회)
Area of law
Data protection · Marketing and consent
Legal basis
Personal Information Protection Act (개인정보 보호법, frühere Fassung) Art. 39-3(1), Art. 31(2), Art. 21(1); Sanktion nach Art. 39-15(1) Nr. 6 a. F.
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Financial services and insurance
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 50% because no penalty had been imposed in the preceding three years, a further 30% for reasons including cooperation with the investigation and finally 40% following the Commission’s deliberations; increase of 25% because the infringement lasted from July 2022 to September 2023.
Liability of senior managers
Marketing and direct sales were able to design the consent flow without any involvement of the chief privacy officer (CPO); the authority found a breach of former Art. 31(2) and ordered that the CPO be given independent powers.
Published
12 Dec 2024

Original amount 6,198,000,000 KRW, converted at the ECB reference rate of 11 Dec 2024.

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial