Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

15cases from 5 jurisdictions
€3.07mTotal of monetary amounts
€859,697Largest single case: Somers Forge Limited
€140,306Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20245€1.12m
20255€661,928
20265€1.28m

15 cases

1 Sep 2026 PPS Metal Recycling LtdScrapyard: £40,000 fine after metal pile collapses on father and son United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €46,699

In February 2025, a pile of scrap collapsed on a father and his son at the metal recycler's site while an excavator had been working near them for around 20 minutes; one of them suffered a broken leg. Pedestrians were separated neither from machinery nor from unstable stockpiles, even though there had been a near miss involving the same excavator shortly before. Fine of £40,000 plus £6,181 costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2025, the company had around 18 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that allow customers or visitors onto a site with machinery must physically separate pedestrians and vehicles and treat near misses as a warning sign.

Authority / court
Grimsby Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 3(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
After the accident, a separate unloading zone, signage, supervised procedures and fenced-off walkways were introduced.
Published
2 Sep 2026

Original amount 40,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Jun 2026 Samson Containers LtdContainer manufacturer ignores notices on welding fume and hearing protection – £30,000 United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €34,694

Despite improvement notices from September 2024 and February 2025, the manufacturer of skips and metal containers failed to implement any measures against carcinogenic welding fume (mild steel) – with neither extraction nor respiratory protection; in addition, there was no health surveillance for hearing for employees exposed to noise. Fine of £30,000 plus costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2024, the company had around 17 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Regulatory orders on hazardous substances have deadlines – companies that let them lapse will be prosecuted regardless of whether an accident occurs.

Authority / court
Warrington Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 33(1)(g) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974 (Nichtbefolgung von Improvement Notices)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
Under 50
Repeat case
yes
Published
18 Jun 2026

Original amount 30,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Feb 2026 All FAB Precision Sheetmetal, Inc.Sheet metal fabricator: second amputation on the same press brake – Cal/OSHA $212,850 USA, CAWorkplace safety and accidents €180,168

In June 2025, an employee in San Jose lost a finger on a press brake without guarding – identical to an accident in June 2024 for which the business had already been fined $43,500. The California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA) imposed $212,850 (including a wilful repeat violation); the employer appealed.

What organisations can take from it

After an accident, retrofitting the machine is mandatory – an identical second accident will be treated as wilful.

Authority / court
California Division of Occupational Safety and Health (Cal/OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
California Code of Regulations, Title 8 (Maschinenschutz)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Steel and metals
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Published
26 Feb 2026

Original amount 212,850 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

18 Feb 2026 Somers Forge LimitedSomers Forge: 750,000 GBP after fatal accident on a 20-metre lathe United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €859,697

In December 2023, a machinist was caught by a lathe and fatally injured while finishing a rotating workpiece with emery cloth. The forge had not prohibited manual work with emery cloth, had not prevented access to moving parts and had not carried out a risk assessment; the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecution resulted in a fine of 750,000 GBP plus 38,314 GBP in costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2025, the company had around 136 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Expressly prohibit dangerous habitual practices on machine tools and safeguard against them with guarding and instruction.

Relevance to training and awareness

Safe working on rotating machinery

Authority / court
Health and Safety Executive (Walsall Magistrates' Court)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s. 2(1)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
50 to 249
Published
18 Feb 2026

Original amount 750,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 18 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Jan 2026 Stanley Wire LimitedWire drawing company: fatal accident at unguarded machine – 140,000 GBP United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €160,514

In 2021 a 45-year-old employee in Penistone became entangled in an unguarded wire drawing and recoiling machine and died. There was no risk assessment, no safe system of work, no fixed guards or interlocks and no formal training, only verbal instruction; after the accident eight prohibition notices were served. Fine of 140,000 GBP plus 6,652 GBP in costs for the business, which had 17 employees according to its annual accounts.

What organisations can take from it

Provide formal training and physical guarding rather than relying on verbal instruction – make dangerous moving parts technically inaccessible.

Relevance to training and awareness

Machinery safety and formal instruction

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Sheffield Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
Under 50
Mitigating circumstances
Early guilty plea
Published
23 Jan 2026

Original amount 140,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Jan 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

5 Dec 2025 FMP West Midlands LimitedMetal polishing firm: fine after crush injury on unguarded tube polishing machine United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €27,501

While feeding a tube polishing machine that had no guarding and defective rollers, an employee's hand was drawn into the machine; one finger was partially severed and two others were crushed. The business had not prevented access to dangerous machine parts. Fine of £24,000 plus costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2025, the company had around 16 employees.

What organisations can take from it

In-running nips on rollers must be protected by fixed guards; defective machines must be taken out of service, not kept running.

Authority / court
Birmingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Regulation 11(1) Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
Under 50
Published
8 Dec 2025

Original amount 24,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 5 Dec 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

13 Oct 2025 Bridgnorth Aluminium LimitedAluminium rolling mill: hydraulic arm falls on worker in casting mould – 300,000 GBP United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €345,742

In 2023 a worker was kneeling in a casting mould when the hydraulic launder arm, weighing around 1.5 tonnes, fell on him as a result of hydraulic failure; he was trapped for more than 20 minutes and has not been able to return to work since. The safety bar was not fit for purpose and the risk of the arm falling had never been assessed; fine of 300,000 GBP plus 8,301 GBP in costs. According to its 2025 annual accounts, the plant had an average of 345 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Do not work beneath raised loads – where this cannot be avoided, use tested mechanical fall-prevention devices.

Authority / court
Cannock Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
250 to 999
Published
20 Oct 2025

Original amount 300,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 13 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Jul 2025 Metex Heat Treating Ltd.Heat treatment firm Metex: CA$144,000 after flash fire during furnace start-up Canada, ONWorkplace safety and accidents €89,949

When restarting a hardening furnace (hydrogen and oil quench bath) that had been shut down for weeks, residual vapours ignited because too much time elapsed between the nitrogen purge and ignition; two workers were seriously injured. Only one was wearing flame-resistant clothing; the other had not been provided with any. Fine of CA$144,000 plus victim fine surcharge.

What organisations can take from it

Infrequently performed tasks such as restarting equipment require fixed step-by-step procedures and complete protective equipment for everyone involved.

Relevance to training and awareness

Start-up procedures for industrial furnaces; protective clothing

Authority / court
Ontario Court of Justice Brampton (Ermittlung: Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 25(2)(h) Occupational Health and Safety Act (Ontario)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea.
Published
21 Aug 2025

Original amount 144,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 May 2025 Brunner Manufacturing & Sales Ltd. (Tecna Forge)Forge Tecna Forge: fatal fall during first-time press maintenance – CA$220,000 Canada, ONWorkplace safety and accidents €140,306

In 2023, two employees of the forge in Niagara Falls removed a spacer from a press for the first time; instead of the guide bolts prescribed in the manual, they used makeshift steel bolts and left the piston assembly, weighing around 1.25 t, hanging from the crane. The load swung out, and a worker fell to the ground with it and died. The company had not informed the employees of the dangers of deviating from the operating manual; fine of CA$220,000 plus victim fine surcharge.

What organisations can take from it

Maintenance tasks performed for the first time require instruction based on the manufacturer's manual – improvising with heavy loads ends in fatalities.

Relevance to training and awareness

Working in accordance with the operating manual on infrequent maintenance tasks

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Provincial Offences Court Welland (Ermittlung: Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 25(2)(d) Occupational Health and Safety Act (Ontario)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea.
Published
20 Jun 2025

Original amount 220,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

12 May 2025 Fostermation Inc.Fostermation: USD 64,892 for child labour and machine guarding failures USAWorkplace safety and accidents €58,430

After a 16-year-old lost a thumb tip on a forming machine at metal components maker Fostermation in Meadville (Pennsylvania) in May 2024, the Wage and Hour Division and OSHA found breaches of child labour regulations and six serious and one other health and safety violation, including missing machine guards and deficient lockout/tagout procedures. The company paid 50,192 USD in civil money penalties for the child labour violations and 14,700 USD under a settlement with OSHA, a total of 64,892 USD. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment.

What organisations can take from it

Minors must not operate hazardous forming machines – work schedules for young workers need a separate check against prohibited tasks.

Relevance to training and awareness

Deploying minors on hazardous machinery

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Wage and Hour Division (WHD) und Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Bundesrechtliche Kinderarbeitsvorschriften (Vollzug durch die Wage and Hour Division); OSHA-Standards zu Maschinenschutz und Lockout/Tagout
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Published
12 May 2025

Original amount 64,892 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 12 May 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Nov 2024 Jindal Tubular USA LLCPipe mill Jindal Tubular: $442,815 settlement after fatal pipe collapse USAWorkplace safety and accidents €425,293

In January 2024, insecurely stacked steel pipes weighing around 900 kg fell at the plant in Bay Saint Louis (Mississippi); a 25-year-old died and a 20-year-old lost both legs. In a settlement with the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the manufacturer of large steel pipes is paying $442,815 and must implement external safety consultants, monthly audits, safety professionals on every shift and three years of accident reporting; there had been 46 OSHA citations in five years.

What organisations can take from it

Storage of heavy steel products requires binding stacking rules and exclusion zones – and repeated citations lead to far-reaching conditions.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970; 29 CFR 1910 (Maschinenschutz, Absturzsicherung, brennbarer Staub u. a.)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Employees
250 to 999
Repeat case
yes
Published
22 Nov 2024

Original amount 442,815 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Nov 2024 United Steel LimitedUnited Steel: 330,000 NZD after fatal collapse of a steel storage rack New ZealandWorkplace safety and accidents €181,678

In November 2020 a rack loaded with around nine tonnes of steel collapsed at the company's steel store in Wigram (Christchurch), killing a storeman; the racks were neither braced nor fixed to the floor, were not inspected regularly and had been built without engineering input. On 1 November 2024 the Christchurch District Court imposed a fine of 330,000 NZD (starting point 600,000 NZD) and 100,000 NZD in reparation for emotional harm; costs of 17,507.39 NZD were added.

What organisations can take from it

Storage racks need proper design, anchoring, regular inspection and supervised instruction in safe loading.

Relevance to training and awareness

Safe storage racking and loading rules

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Christchurch District Court (Anklage: WorkSafe New Zealand)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Health and Safety at Work Act 2015, ss 36(1)(a), 48(1), 48(2)(c)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Reductions for cooperation (5%), remorse including payments already made to the family (10%), willingness to pay reparation (10%), guilty plea (15%) and no previous convictions in 43 years of trading (5%).
Published
11 Nov 2024

Original amount 330,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 1 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

23 Jul 2024 an Australian steel processorAustralian steel processor: 92,000 AUD after three serious hand injuries on bending machines AustraliaWorkplace safety and accidentsanonymised €56,111

The Gippsland steel processor (since renamed) was fined a total of 92,000 AUD (20,000, 32,000 and 40,000 AUD) by the Magistrates' Court in Latrobe after pleading guilty to three charges, and must also pay 15,836 AUD in costs. Between November 2020 and February 2023, three workers suffered serious hand injuries on machines used to bend and roll steel. Among other things, there was no additional activation safeguard besides the foot pedal, no supervision of an inexperienced operator and no working emergency stops and lockouts.

What organisations can take from it

Machines with crushing hazards need working safeguards, regular maintenance and supervision of workers not yet deemed competent.

Relevance to training and awareness

Machine safety and supervision on bending and rolling machines

Authority / court
WorkSafe Victoria
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 (Vic): sichere Anlagen, Aufsicht, sichere Arbeitssysteme
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Steel and metals
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea.
Published
1 Aug 2024

Original amount 92,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 23 Jul 2024.

Checked against the official source on 7 Oct 2026 · Company name anonymised since 23 Jul 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

26 Feb 2024 a Canadian steel producerSteel producer: CA$200,000 after fatal conveyor accident involving a lone worker Canada, ONWorkplace safety and accidentsanonymised €136,295

A coal worker working alone at the company's steelworks was presumably applying belt dressing spray between the running belt and the head pulley when he was fatally caught; the head section of the conveyor was not guarded, and there was no safe method for applying the spray while the belt was running. Fine of CA$200,000 plus victim fine surcharge.

What organisations can take from it

Where employees have to intervene while equipment is running, a safe technical solution is needed – and lone working requires a monitoring concept.

Relevance to training and awareness

No intervention in running conveyor systems; lone working

Authority / court
Ontario Court of Justice Hamilton (Ermittlung: Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 25(1)(c) Occupational Health and Safety Act (Ontario) i. V. m. s. 196(2)(a) O. Reg. 854 (Mines and Mining Plants)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Steel and metals
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea; subsequently improved rules on lone working and machine guarding across the entire operation.
Published
6 Mar 2024

Original amount 200,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 26 Feb 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 26 Feb 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 Feb 2024 a US steel fabrication businessSteel fabricator: OSHA proposes $348,683 over alleged deficiencies despite warning from its own consultant USAWorkplace safety and accidentsanonymised €322,795

According to the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), inspectors responding to a complaint found at a family-run steel fabrication business in New Jersey, among other things, missing medical evaluations for respirator users, uninspected overhead cranes, incorrectly used welding screens and missing chemical hazard training; according to OSHA, a safety consultant had identified the deficiencies months earlier. OSHA proposed penalties of $348,683 (4 violations classified as wilful, 7 as serious); the violations are alleged, and the company has contested the citations.

What organisations can take from it

A consultant's report identifying known deficiencies that is not acted upon will later serve as evidence of wilfulness.

Relevance to training and awareness

Hazardous substance training for new employees

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
29 CFR 1910.134, 1910.179, 1910.1200 u. a.
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
under appeal
Sector
Steel and metals
Culpability
intentional
Published
20 Feb 2024

Original amount 348,683 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Feb 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 5 · Company name anonymised since 20 Feb 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial