Compliance Radar

Who was sanctioned, and for what?

Fines, court rulings and incidents from Europe, North America, Latin America, Asia-Pacific, Middle East and Africa: 2,207 cases from 44 jurisdictions, each with an official source and checked against that source before publication. Filter by country, area of law and sector. Click a chart to drill down one level.

21cases from 8 jurisdictions
€15.4mTotal of monetary amounts (20 cases with an amount)
€337,938Median per case with an amount

Click a bar to drill down one level.

When?

per year, by date of decision
Trend
PeriodCasesTotal
20232€2.14m
20243€2.39m
20255€1.77m
202611€9.1m

21 cases

4 Sep 2026 Samworth Brothers LimitedSamworth Brothers: £594,000 after two workers scalded at steam line United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €691,518

At the Kettleby Foods plant in Melton Mowbray, an employee and a contractor were scalded with hot water while replacing a leaking gasket on an isolation valve of a steam line (burns to 4–5 % and 9 % of their body surface respectively). The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found that the task had neither been assessed nor documented as a safe system of work, isolation and lock-off procedures had not been applied, fall protection was missing and supervision was inadequate. Following a guilty plea, a fine of £594,000, plus £6,000 compensation for the injured employee, costs and a victim surcharge.

What organisations can take from it

Maintenance on steam and pressure lines requires a written isolation and lock-off procedure that is supervised on site.

Relevance to training and awareness

Isolating and locking off equipment during maintenance (lockout/tagout)

Authority / court
Birmingham Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2 Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
16 Sep 2026

Original amount 594,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

3 Sep 2026 SSM Investments LimitedTakeaway operator SSM Investments: 90,000 NZD penalty for worker exploitation New ZealandMinimum wage and undeclared work €45,501

The restaurant and takeaway business with branches in Auckland and Cromwell did not pay five employees the minimum wage, denied holiday, public holiday and sick pay, made unlawful deductions from wages and kept no accurate wage, time and leave records. After the Employment Relations Authority (ERA, New Zealand's employment tribunal) had already ordered arrears of 147,001 NZD, it imposed a penalty of 90,000 NZD against the company following an investigation by the Labour Inspectorate (labour standards enforcement unit of the Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment). Measures against individuals are not set out here.

What organisations can take from it

Minimum wage, holiday pay and proper time records are mandatory.

Relevance to training and awareness

Minimum wage, holiday pay and permissible wage deductions

Authority / court
Employment Relations Authority (Verfahren des Labour Inspectorate, MBIE)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
The company acknowledged its wrongdoing.
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not set out here.
Published
3 Sep 2026

Original amount 90,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 3 Sep 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 Maple Lodge Farms Ltd.Poultry processor Maple Lodge Farms: CA$500,000 after CO2 leak without gas detection system Canada, ONWorkplace safety and accidents €309,578

In March 2024, a CO2 hose on a vacuum mixer ruptured in the deli area of the plant in Brampton; around 16,000 pounds of carbon dioxide escaped and one worker suffered life-threatening injuries. There was no CO2 sensor with an alarm. Following a guilty plea, a fine of CA$500,000 plus a 25 % victim fine surcharge.

What organisations can take from it

Wherever refrigerant or inert gases are used in quantity, a gas detection system is part of the basic equipment.

Authority / court
Provincial Offences Court Brampton (Ermittlung: Ontario Ministry of Labour, Immigration, Training and Skills Development)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 25(2)(h) Occupational Health and Safety Act (Ontario)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea; permanently installed CO2 sensor after the incident.
Published
27 Aug 2026

Original amount 500,000 CAD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 27 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

27 Aug 2026 Flower bulb business failed to disclose hours of Polish seasonal workers – fine of around 95,600 EUR NetherlandsMinimum wage and undeclared work €95,588

A lily and tulip grower with an average of around 50 (at peak 75) employees, where Polish migrant workers are employed (anonymised in the judgment), was unable to produce sufficient records of hours worked and wages paid for 18 employees for September 2020 to February 2021. The Dutch Minister of Social Affairs and Employment (Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid) imposed 118,000 EUR in 2024 (112,100 EUR after objection); the North Netherlands District Court (Rechtbank Noord-Nederland) reduced the fine to 95,587.50 EUR, partly because of measures taken and excessively long proceedings.

What organisations can take from it

Companies employing seasonal workers must be able to document hours and wage payments for each person without gaps – missing records are fined separately for each employee.

Authority / court
Rechtbank Noord-Nederland (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid / Nederlandse Arbeidsinspectie)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Art. 18b Abs. 2 Wet minimumloon en minimumvakantiebijslag (Wml)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
reduced
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
50 to 249
Mitigating circumstances
Reduction of 12.5 % for appropriate measures, 5 % for delay and 2,500 EUR for exceeding the reasonable length of proceedings.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

20 Aug 2026 IPMF LLC (NaturPak)NaturPak: $364,100 proposed after three deaths caused by bursting kettle lids USAWorkplace safety and accidents €311,703

At the food plant in Janesville (Wisconsin), the lids of pressurised industrial kettles opened in February and March 2026, scalding workers with steam and hot liquid; three people died. The U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) proposed a total of $364,100 for both inspections combined, including repeat violations relating to fall protection and lockout/tagout.

What organisations can take from it

After a serious accident, the technical cause must be eliminated immediately – otherwise, as here, a second similar incident may follow.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970; 29 CFR 1910 (u. a. Lockout/Tagout, Absturzsicherung, persönliche Schutzausrüstung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Repeat case
yes
Published
20 Aug 2026

Original amount 364,100 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 20 Aug 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Jul 2026 Puratos LimitedPuratos: 120,000 GBP for flour dust above exposure limits and heavy sack handling United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €141,014

During an inspection in December 2024, the Health and Safety Executive (HSE) found dust escaping from machinery, blowing down with compressed air and dry sweeping at the bakery ingredients factory; measurements confirmed that workplace exposure limits had been exceeded, with a risk of asthma. In addition, employees lifted 25 kg sacks by hand every day. The site had already been cited in 2021 for the same deficiencies; fine of 120,000 GBP plus 6,270 GBP in costs. According to the annual accounts filed with the UK companies register for financial year 2024, the company had around 116 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Companies that do not permanently remedy deficiencies after a citation pay significantly more the next time – flour dust is a recognised cause of asthma.

Relevance to training and awareness

Dust exposure and lifting heavy loads

Authority / court
Health and Safety Executive (Milton Keynes Magistrates' Court)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s. 2(1)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
50 to 249
Repeat case
yes
Published
20 Jul 2026

Original amount 120,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 17 Jul 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

25 Jun 2026 Risham Nominees Pty Ltd (Centenary Bakehouse)Centenary Bakehouse: record 3.4 million AUD fine for workplace manslaughter AustraliaWorkplace safety and accidents €2.07m

The Supreme Court of Victoria sentenced Risham Nominees Pty Ltd, operator of Centenary Bakehouse, after a guilty plea for workplace manslaughter to a fine of 3.4 million AUD, the highest penalty to date for a single offence under the workplace safety laws of the state of Victoria. During ceiling works at the bakery in Reservoir in August 2021, a worker fell around four metres and suffered fatal head injuries. The company had taken no measures against falls and did not require the use of harnesses that were available, although an independent scaffold would have been reasonably practicable.

What organisations can take from it

For work at height, engineered fall protection such as scaffolding must be planned before work starts; harnesses lying ready without a duty to wear them are not enough.

Relevance to training and awareness

Fall risks when working at height

Authority / court
WorkSafe Victoria
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Workplace-Manslaughter-Bestimmungen des Arbeitsschutzrechts von Victoria (fahrlässiges Verhalten unter Verletzung einer geschuldeten Pflicht mit Todesfolge)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
negligent
Mitigating circumstances
Guilty plea.
Published
25 Jun 2026

Original amount 3,400,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 25 Jun 2026.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

7 May 2026 Duncan Farms LimitedDuncan Farms: 53,000 GBP because a worker was caught in an unguarded conveyor United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €61,335

In October 2024, an employee of the egg producer climbed between two running manure conveyors to check a noise and was caught at the in-running nip; he suffered nerve damage to both arms. The drive had no fixed or interlocked guards – instruction and clothing rules alone were not sufficient. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) prosecution resulted in a fine of 53,000 GBP.

What organisations can take from it

Instruction is no substitute for technical safeguards: in-running nips must be protected by fixed or interlocked guards.

Relevance to training and awareness

Stopping machinery before intervening

Authority / court
Health and Safety Executive (Aberdeen Sheriff Court)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998, reg. 11(1) und (2); Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974, s. 33(1)(c)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
13 May 2026

Original amount 53,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 7 May 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

10 Apr 2026 MM Flowers LimitedFlower supplier: leg amputated after roller deck accident – 134,000 GBP United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidents €153,837

While unloading stuck air cargo skids ahead of Valentine's Day 2023, an employee's leg became trapped in a 10 cm gap in the roller deck and was struck by a skid that slid forward; the leg had to be amputated. Employees had to free stuck loads by hand, and the gap had never been identified; fine of 134,000 GBP plus 4,908 GBP in costs. According to its annual accounts (financial year to August 2025), the flower supplier had an average of 882 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Include everyday tasks such as freeing stuck loads in the risk assessment – especially for peak periods.

Authority / court
Peterborough Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
250 to 999
Published
13 Apr 2026

Original amount 134,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 10 Apr 2026.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 2 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

1 Apr 2026 Twelve Cupcakes Pte. Ltd.Twelve Cupcakes (Singapore): stern warning over unpaid salaries for 80 employees SingaporeMinimum wage and undeclared work Reprimand or warning

The Ministry of Manpower (MOM, Singapore's labour ministry) issued Twelve Cupcakes Pte. Ltd. a formal stern warning because 80 employees were not paid their salaries for 1 to 29 October 2025 after the company closed on 29 October 2025. The parent company Dhunseri Ventures Limited had placed it into liquidation because of an acute cash-flow shortfall; the ministry regarded the case as a genuine business closure in financial distress rather than a deliberate attempt to evade salary obligations and therefore limited its action to the warning.

What organisations can take from it

Even an unavoidable closure does not release an employer from paying wages – informing employees, the union and the authority early reduces the consequences for all sides.

Relevance to training and awareness

Salary payment obligations when closing a business

Authority / court
Ministry of Manpower (MOM), Singapur
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Employment Act (EA), Singapur (fristgerechte Lohnzahlung)
Action
Reprimand or warning
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
50 to 249
Mitigating circumstances
Salaries paid in full up to and including September 2025 despite continued losses, union informed on the day management learned of the liquidation, liquidator appointed; salary claims rank ahead of other unsecured debts in the insolvency.
Published
1 Apr 2026

Checked against the official source on 4 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 Feb 2026 Alco Harvesting LLC dba Bonipak Produce Inc. und verbundene UnternehmenBonipak: $6.175 million for farmworkers over undisclosed paid sick leave USA, CAMinimum wage and undeclared work €5.22m

Following the COVID death of a farmworker in employer-provided housing, the California Labor Commissioner's Office sued the agricultural business in Santa Maria in 2021: more than 10,000 farmworkers, including H-2A seasonal workers, had not been informed of their entitlement to paid sick leave; in addition, there was unpaid travel time as well as overtime and minimum wage violations. The settlement of $6,175,000 (of which $4.2 million goes directly to workers) includes posting and reporting obligations.

What organisations can take from it

Information obligations towards seasonal workers are not a formality – companies that leave workers in the dark about paid sick leave are liable for the consequences.

Authority / court
California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
California Labor Code (Paid Sick Leave, COVID-19 Supplemental Paid Sick Leave, Mindestlohn, Überstunden)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
4 Feb 2026

Original amount 6,175,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Feb 2026.

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

17 Dec 2025 Asparagus farm without reliable working time records: Raad van State upholds 11,250 EUR NetherlandsWorking time €11,250

In May/June 2022, the working time records of an asparagus business (anonymised in the judgment) deviated structurally from the hours actually worked; among other things, Sunday work went unrecorded, so compliance with working and rest times could not be checked. The Administrative Jurisdiction Division of the Dutch Council of State (Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak) upheld the fine of 11,250 EUR, imposed in 2023 without prior warning, including the increase factor of 1.5.

What organisations can take from it

Working time records that do not reflect actual hours are treated as missing – businesses are then sanctioned without prior warning.

Relevance to training and awareness

Correct recording of working and rest times

Authority / court
Raad van State, Afdeling bestuursrechtspraak (Bußgeld: Minister van Sociale Zaken en Werkgelegenheid)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Working time
Legal basis
Art. 4:3 Abs. 1 Arbeidstijdenwet
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture

Checked against the official source on 25 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

24 Nov 2025 Taylor Farms New Jersey Inc.Taylor Farms New Jersey: USD 1.13m in OSHA penalties after fatal cleaning accident USAWorkplace safety and accidents €974,951

After an employee was fatally injured while cleaning a machine at the fresh-cut vegetable plant in Swedesboro (New Jersey) in May 2025, OSHA cited Taylor Farms New Jersey, a subsidiary of Taylor Fresh Foods, for 16 violations, which it describes as wilful and repeated, and proposed penalties of 1,125,484 USD; the allegations concern missing lockout/tagout procedures and lack of training. The on-site staffing agency PL Solutions Group LLC (People Logistics) received three separate citations with 33,100 USD. The companies could contest the citations before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission. The authority allegedly made the findings set out here; this account is not based on a final judgment. The decision is not final.

What organisations can take from it

Cleaning production equipment is maintenance – without energy isolation and lockout there is a risk to life, including for agency workers.

Relevance to training and awareness

Isolating energy during cleaning and maintenance

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Occupational Safety and Health Act; OSHA-Standard zur Kontrolle gefährlicher Energien (Lockout/Tagout)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
not yet final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Repeat case
yes
Published
24 Nov 2025

Original amount 1,125,484 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 24 Nov 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

29 Oct 2025 JBS Australia Pty LtdJBS Australia: AUD 330,000 fine after forklift accident AustraliaWorkplace safety and accidents €187,170

In July 2022 a 56-year-old worker in the palletising area of a JBS Australia site was struck by a forklift and seriously injured in the leg. Following a SafeWork NSW investigation, the District Court convicted the company of breaching its health and safety duty and fined it AUD 330,000.

What organisations can take from it

Palletising and storage areas need consistent separation of forklift traffic and walkways.

Relevance to training and awareness

Separating pedestrians from forklift traffic in storage and palletising areas

Authority / court
SafeWork NSW / District Court of NSW
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
ss 32, 19(1) Work Health and Safety Act 2011 (NSW)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
31 Mar 2026

Original amount 330,000 AUD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 29 Oct 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

4 Sep 2025 Midri, Inc. (Restaurant J BBQ, Los Angeles)Restaurant J BBQ: 680,238 USD – breaks denied, split shifts without premium USA, CAWorking time €584,046

The Koreatown restaurant regularly denied 48 employees meal and rest breaks, required them to remain available for guests even during the lunch break, did not pay split-shift premiums and did not pay all wages. The California Labor Commissioner’s Office imposed 680,238 USD, of which 538,638 USD for the benefit of the employees.

What organisations can take from it

In the restaurant trade, breaks must be actively scheduled and documented – being on call for guests during the break turns it into working time.

Relevance to training and awareness

Break arrangements in the restaurant trade

Authority / court
California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Working time
Legal basis
California Labor Code (Meal and Rest Periods, Split Shift Premium, Lohnabrechnung)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.

Original amount 680,238 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 4 Sep 2025.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

9 Jul 2025 Well Sushi LimitedWell Sushi (New Zealand): 30,000 NZD penalty for minimum wage and holiday breaches New ZealandMinimum wage and undeclared work €15,350

On the application of a Labour Inspector, the Employment Relations Authority (New Zealand's employment relations tribunal) ordered Well Sushi Limited to pay a penalty of 30,000 NZD to the Crown. The company had admitted failing to pay an employee on a work visa the minimum wage for all hours worked, miscalculating his annual leave, public holiday and sick leave entitlements and failing to keep complete time and wage records; arrears totalling 53,940.03 NZD had already been paid under a settlement. No penalties were sought against the co-respondent Hutt Food Limited because the time limit had expired.

What organisations can take from it

Incomplete time records are not a mere formality: they lead to incorrect wage and leave calculations – particularly for employees on work visas.

Relevance to training and awareness

Time recording as the basis for correct wage and leave calculations

Authority / court
Employment Relations Authority, Wellington (Antrag: Labour Inspector, Ministry of Business, Innovation and Employment)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Employment Relations Act 2000 (ss. 130, 135), Minimum Wage Act 1983 (s. 6), Holidays Act 2003 (u. a. ss. 16, 24, 25, 28A, 40, 49, 50, 60, 71, 72, 81)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Repeat case
no
Mitigating circumstances
Settlement without a hearing, full payment of arrears, changed payroll processes and no previous breaches; the Authority therefore reduced the calculated 40,000 NZD to 30,000 NZD.

Original amount 30,000 NZD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 9 Jul 2025.

Checked against the official source on 3 Oct 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

19 Nov 2024 Valenti's Bakery LLCNew Jersey bakery: OSHA proposes $385,221 because deficiencies allegedly remained after finger amputation USAWorkplace safety and accidents €364,172

Following the partial amputation of two fingers on an automatic blade, the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) had inspected the bakery in Paterson in June 2023; according to OSHA, lockout/tagout procedures were still missing at the follow-up inspection in May 2024, and exit routes were blocked and fall edges unprotected. OSHA proposed penalties of $385,221 (including for failure to abate, 2 violations classified as wilful and 1 as repeat); the violations are alleged and may be contested.

What organisations can take from it

Follow-up inspections are the rule – companies that do not remedy cited deficiencies must expect additional penalties for failure to abate.

Authority / court
U.S. Department of Labor – Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
29 CFR 1910.147 (Lockout/Tagout), 1910.37 (Fluchtwege), 1910.212 (Maschinenschutz)
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
intentional
Repeat case
yes
Published
19 Nov 2024

Original amount 385,221 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 19 Nov 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 3 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

16 Sep 2024 five Californian outlet companies of a fast-food franchiseeFast-food franchisee: 1.7 million USD – overtime evaded by splitting up companies USA, CAWorking timeanonymised €1.53m

The franchisee ran five outlets of a fast-food chain in California as separate companies and deployed employees at several locations on the same day. As a result, they lost out on overtime premiums after eight hours a day or 40 hours a week, premiums for missed meal breaks, paid travel time and the higher minimum wage for larger employers; the settlement of 1.7 million USD concerns around 550 employees.

What organisations can take from it

Working time is added up across all locations of the same employer – splitting into separate companies does not protect against overtime obligations.

Authority / court
California Labor Commissioner's Office (Division of Labor Standards Enforcement)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Working time
Legal basis
California Labor Code (Overtime, Meal Periods, Mindestlohn)
Action
Other
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Culpability
intentional
Liability of senior managers
Measures against individuals are not reported here.

Original amount 1,700,000 USD, converted at the ECB reference rate of 16 Sep 2024.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 6 · Company name anonymised since 16 Sep 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

30 Jan 2024 Vegetable grower cheats harvest workers out of minimum wage: around 500,000 EUR in fines and confiscation GermanyMinimum wage and undeclared workanonymised €500,000

A vegetable-growing business did not pay harvest workers the collectively agreed minimum wage; the shortfall was just under 300,000 EUR. The investigation was based on interviews conducted with interpreters and the analysis of working time and harvest volume data. Fines of around 200,000 EUR were imposed, and around 300,000 EUR in proceeds of the offence were confiscated in addition (date = publication).

What organisations can take from it

Piece-rate and volume-based pay in seasonal work must reach the minimum wage per hour; deductions for accommodation and work equipment are closely scrutinised.

Authority / court
Hauptzollamt Karlsruhe (Finanzkontrolle Schwarzarbeit)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Minimum wage and undeclared work
Legal basis
Mindestlohn- bzw. Tarifrecht (tariflich bestimmter Mindestlohn); Einziehung des Tatertrags
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
unknown
Sector
Food and agriculture
Published
30 Jan 2024
Sources

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 30 Jan 2026 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

22 Nov 2023 a British food manufacturerFood manufacturer: £700,000 after finger amputation while cleaning a machine United KingdomWorkplace safety and accidentsanonymised €804,320

An employee lost two fingers when his hand was drawn into a rotary valve while he was removing a piece of string from a chute on a breading line. The HSE criticised missing guarding, an inadequate risk assessment and inadequate training. Fine of £700,000 plus costs.

What organisations can take from it

Cleaning and fault clearance are high-risk activities – guarding and training must cover precisely these situations.

Relevance to training and awareness

Safe cleaning of machinery only when stopped

Missing or inadequate training played a role in the decision.

Authority / court
Lincoln Magistrates' Court (Anklage: Health and Safety Executive)
Area of law
Health and safety and employment law · Workplace safety and accidents
Legal basis
Section 2(1) Health and Safety at Work etc. Act 1974; Regulation 11(1) Provision and Use of Work Equipment Regulations 1998
Action
Fine
Status of proceedings
final
Sector
Food and agriculture
Employees
1,000 to 9,999
Published
22 Nov 2023

Original amount 700,000 GBP, converted at the ECB reference rate of 22 Nov 2023.

Checked against the official source on 28 Sep 2026 · Version 4 · Company name anonymised since 22 Nov 2025 · Direct link

Report an error

Anonymous: we store only your text, no contact details and no IP address.

Load 1 more of 1

Ready for training that actually lands?

Try the combination for free: automated administration for you, learning formats that fit your team, with no minimum or credit card.

Start 14-day free trial